Wrote on 28 May 2012
IT WOULD BE NICE IF S C GIVES ITS REASONS WHY THERE NEED NOT BE BENCHES AT KOLKATTA/HYDERABAD/BOMBAY/MADAS. AFTER ALL FILING AND COMING TO DELHI IS OVER CROWDING THE S C AS WELL AND ALSO S C CANNOT THROW AWAY CASES WITH HALF HEARTED JUDGEMENTS OR JUST DISMISSALS. AFTER ALL INDIAN S C DIES NOT FUNCTION THE LINES OF U S SUPREME COURT WHERE ADMISSIONS ARE NOT JUST ROUTINE LIKE IN INDIAN S C. WE FOLLOW U K SYSTEM SO WE DEFINITELY NEED MORE BENCHES AND MOR E ADVOCATES TO FIGHT THE MATTERS BESIDES MORE ADVOCATES MEAN BETTER CHOICE AND LESS FEES THE CLIENTS WILL NEED BENEFITED, AFTER AL CASES ARE NOT CENTERED ON RICH AND WEALTHY BUT MOST ON POOR PEOPLE TOO SIRS!
|
Wrote on 05 May 2012
good idea
will reduce delhi crowding
hotel industry may oppose
|
Wrote on 04 May 2012
The H S C should be requested to reconsider the issue in the light that justice should reach at the door step of Aam Jan It should be reachable to it Justice should be less n less costly and within reach.Centralisation is colonial system.
|
Wrote on 02 May 2012
here the question is about access to justice which is fundamental right u/a 21 of each citizen. all litigants known that they have to suffer to have a matter in SC in delhi. The view of the SC not to accept is without jurisdiction. settingup of benchs is the prerogative of the State and the SC cannot refuse. Its high time the Judiciary [SC] realises its constitutional duty to give access to justice to all. Advocate Sandeep Kapatkar, Pune
|
Wrote on 01 May 2012
there is very dificult for general public to knock the door of Supreme Court at Delhi. if benches established then and then only justice can be done. because the litigants or public in others part of country can not afford fees and other travelling and allied expences. therefore in the interest of justice there must be benches as recomended by law commission.
|
Wrote on 01 May 2012
The best solution, in the existing circumstances, lies in what I had suggested in my Blog 2 years ago: http://consultant-law-education-india-nepal.in/wordpress/
|
Wrote on 29 April 2012
My friend Mr. Misra is under a misconeption. The shops of senior advocates who are in demand never closes. They are going to various High Court in chartered plans and charge lakhs of Rupees for one hearing and now they will be charging for Supreme Court benches also. It will be public at large who will be benefited and senior advocates will not suffer but advocates who are panel advocates will suffer as their share will stans transfered to respective benches whereas advocates of that area will be benefitted.
|
Wrote on 29 April 2012
1. Opening up of Zonal Supreme Court in four Metros, is cleared by the Executive (Minister of Law).
2. Decisions about opening up of addtional courts involves Executive decisions and administrative powers, such as Place, Salaries and so on and the Judiciary could not have any role in such matters (E.O.E.)
3. In the overall interest of the General Public and to the exclusion of the judiciary and in context to the crores of cases pending before the Indian Judiciary, Additional Zonal Supreme Court would serve the much needed justice.
4. In view of the larger interest of the public, The Executive should take a positive decision and open up the proposed Zonal Supreme Courts in the four metros, as soon as possible.
Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
Legal Consultants : 9820174108
|
Wrote on 28 April 2012
I dont understand this was very good idea why supreme court did not accept this idea becaue many shops of leading advpcates would be closed, they were not bothered about the poor litigants to give justice
|
