Wrote on 15 May 2013
If some people are saying that women are misusing the matrimonail laws and doing money grabbling, i am not agree for the same. If person is belive in marraige then there should be maintence and sridhan related rights also should there. Problem is only currupted politicians and advocates who are not interested to change in system. why Advocates in India not ready to start movement against Government to improve the Judiciary system ?
|
Wrote on 28 March 2013
DEAR ASMITA0009 CAN U ANSWER WHAT HAPPEN TO THE FAMILY OF THOSE MAN & HIS FAMILY WHICH ARE GOING FROM THIS SITUATION OF FALSE CASES & WHAT HAPPEN TO THOSE WOMAN WHICH ARE FILED THIS. ALSO MR. JAY THIS IS NOT 65% COURT NUMBER IS 98% CASES ARE FALSE
|
Wrote on 05 July 2012
Dear asmita0009,
Nobody said "all women are misusing this law"....65% of these cases are fabricated by the wife or by the lawyer. It's a fact! Accept it !!!
|
Wrote on 21 February 2012
actually now a days some people are creating wrong picture in society about missuse of IPC498 and domestic violence act 2005 by women. people /govt of india/media etc should have to go in to the court premises and meet to the women personally. Actual thing is that Our politicians, police and advocates are not interested in speedy justice. So,after IPC 498 law dowry harrassment decrease and some men are doing mental harrassment, like creating doubt is mind of wife,making love affares with other women, saying wife as mad women etc. Becaue we all know that there are thousand of cases pending since years and years where women are not getting their stridhan back from her husbands, however there are special laws. further in maintence act after giving all evidences women are getting only appro 5% of husbands income as maintence. Due to few of misuse nobody can say that all women are misusing this law.
|
Wrote on 02 May 2011
Police and croupt lawyer are misusing this law with the help of dishonest women
|
Wrote on 21 April 2011
I'm complelty agree,that now "DOWRY LAW" is without investment business for women and her family. I said that,B'coz I'm Haunted by this Law.
|
Wrote on 14 December 2010
There should be equilibrium in law and justice and its should not be gender biased.
Today women is claiming ,maintenance whether they have any real problem with their husband or not but they are claiming it as a matter of right and it becomes business now to earn easy money. Marry the rich person , do quarrel with them and then claim maintenance and alimony. When she is not ready to co-operate and take care of her husband and family then why she should get any maintenance/alimony. IT MUST BE STOPPED AND BE GIVEN ONLY IN DESERVING CASES WHERE HUSBAND IS GUILTY AND WIFE IS INNOCENT.IT WILL SAVE THE FAMILIES.
It is a jungle raj and way to become rich on others money.
If husband has duty to maintain her wife then wife has also duty to take care of him and give love and affection. So there should be no maintenance at all for wife's who are just trying to enrich them by using this ANDHA KANOON.
Certain suggestions to preserve families and to save them:
• No maintenance till guilty is proved and if husband is ready to reconcile and bear all the expenses of wife and children if she re-joins him.
• No maintenance and alimony in the 2nd marriage if she has got it in the first divorce.
• No maintenance if she can maintain her or her parents can maintain her and if husband is ready to take her back.
• Compulsory mediation for avoiding long legal battle.
• Law should be such that both husband and wife try to reconcile .
• Law should not be favoring anyone to ensure that marriages are saved.
Domestic violence complaint / fir should be filed within 24 hours of alleged incidence in place of today's situation in which wife and her parents try to black mail the husband and his family to agree to their terms and if they do not agree then they file case even after many years.
DV Act must be applicable equally to men and women as today women is more aggressive and ill-treat, abuse, beat husbands and in-laws but the DV Act not applicable to them. It must cover wife's and their families to ensure equality and justice.
Limits provided in the Act for filing mutual consent Divorce after 1 year separation, desertion of 2 year,3 years for IRBM etc. should be removed and it should be only 3 months so both can start their life’s afresh. When two persons can marry without any waiting period then there should be no waiting period for separation.
The most important thing is to fix time limit for completion of hearing and disposal of case in any court say 6 months only. The cases must be tried on fast track basis. The infrastructure of the legislative system should be strenght4ened and cases must be disposed off within 6 months.
For filing cases some minimum requirement of proofs etc. must be there and it should not be like this that for any small small issue anybody can go and file the case.
Specially for family matters pre-litigation mediation must be compulsory and the behavior/flexibility of each party in resolving the issue must be recorded and should be base of their case in future (if any).
Pre-neputal agreement should be made legal so husband and wife are aware before hand what they are going to get or loose if they part there ways and they should be allowed to take divorce on the terms mentioned in the agreement without going to court.
Dowry law, Hindu Marriage law, Domestic violence Act etc. must be made equal for both husband and wife. Lacs of husband are suiciding because of these biased laws.
|
Wrote on 01 October 2010
Lawyers abetting such false cases should foot the bill.
|
Wrote on 10 September 2010
In UK till today, dowry is given by the man. In 19th Century it used to be timber and now a top class house and cars etc. This applies to many Indian States as well.
|
Wrote on 03 September 2010
I think 498a is designed, only to create jobs for lawyers. But is it creating a strong foundation of India. What will we have 10-15 years down the road. Broken families, may be not broken families but terrorised families and traumatised children.
|
