DIRECTIVES OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT ON THE MENACE OF RAGGING
In view of the increasing incidents of ragging in colleges and
elsewhere that reached proportions unbecoming of a civilised society the Honble
Supreme court admitted and heard the SLP No (s) 24295 of 2006 University of Kerala
Vs Council, Principals, Colleges, Kerala & Ors (with SLP(C) No.24296-99/2004 &
W.P. (Crl) No. 173/2006 and SLP(C) No.14356/2005).
Pursuant to an order of Honble Supreme
Court of India dated November 27, 2006, the Ministry of Human Resource Development
has constituted a Committee under the Chairmanship of Shri R.K. Raghavan (former
Director, CBI) to look into the issue of ragging and suggest means of prevention
of ragging in educational institutions.
The Committee primarily examined the following
broad aspects of ragging:
(a) Means and methods
of prevention of ragging.
(b) Possible action
that can be taken against persons indulging in ragging.
(c) Possible action
that can be taken against college/university authorities in the event of ragging.
had carried out a very detailed study with the help of voluntary organizations including
CURE (Coalition for Uprooting Ragging from Education) and SPACE (Society for Peoples
Action Change and Enforcement) and collected voluminous public opinion on the various
factors contributing for ragging. Noted psychologists and educationists assisted
the committee. The National Informatics Centre at the Ministry of Human Resources
hosted a guest book in their website. Nearly eleven press releases were made
during this period of evaluation and committee visited several
cities in the country. A subcommittee of the Medical Council of India was also constituted
for this purpose. A questionnaire was prepared that elicited over 12500 responses.
In short a wide cross-section of the society provided the necessary background information,
data and suggestions on tackling ragging in the country for consideration by the
the committee submitted a detailed report with suitable recommendations and measures
required to effectively curb the menace. The recommendations of the Committee were
duly accepted and the following directives have been issued to all the educational
institutions for necessary implementation by the Honble Supreme Court on 16 May
I. The following factors need to be focused to tackle with the problem:
(a) Primary responsibility for curbing ragging rests with academic institutions themselves.
(b) Ragging adversely impacts the standards of higher education.
(c) Incentives should be available to institutions for curbing the menace and there should be disincentives for failure to do so.
(d) Enrolment in academic pursuits or a campus life should not immunize any adult citizen from penal provisions of the laws of the land.
(e) Ragging needs to be perceived as failure to inculcate human values from the schooling stage.
(f) Behavioural patterns among students, particularly potential 'raggers', need to be identified.
(g) Measures against ragging must deter its recurrence.
(h) Concerted action is required at the level of the school, higher educational institution, district administration, university,
State and Central Governments to make any curb effective.
(i) Media and the Civil Society should be involved in this exercise.
II The Committee has made several recommendations. For the present, the apex court felt that the following
recommendations should be implemented without any further lapse of time
(1)The punishment to be meted out has to be exemplary and justifiably harsh to act as a deterrent against recurrence of such incidents.
(2) Every single incident of ragging where the victim or his parent/guardian or the Head of institution is not satisfied with
the institutional arrangement for action, a First Information Report (FIR) must be filed without exception by the institutional authorities with the
local police authorities. Any failure on the part of the institutional authority or negligence or deliberate delay in lodging the FIR
with the local police shall be construed to be an act of culpable negligence on the part of the institutional authority.
If any victim or his parent/guardian of ragging intends to file FIR directly with the police, that will not
absolve the institutional authority from the requirement of filing the FIR.
(3) Courts should make an effort to ensure that cases involving ragging are taken up on a priority basis to send the correct message
that ragging is not only to be discourages but also to be dealt with sternness.
(4) In addition, the court directed the possibility of introducing in the educational curriculum a subject relating to ragging shall be
explored by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and the respective State Council of Educational
Research and Training (SCERT). This aspect can be included in the teaching of the subjects "Human Rights".
(5) In the prospectus to be issued for admission by educational institutions, it shall be clearly stipulated that in case the applicant
for admission is found to have indulged in ragging in the past or if it is noticed later that he has indulged in ragging, admission may be refused or he shall
be expelled from the educational institution.
(6) The Central Government and the State Governments shall launch a programme giving wide publicity to the menace of ragging and the
consequences which follow in case any student is detected to have been involved in ragging.
(7) It shall be the collective responsibility of the authorities and functionaries of the concerned institution and their role shall also be open to
scrutiny for the purpose of finding out whether they have taken effective steps for preventing ragging and in case of their failure, action
can be taken; for example, denial of any grant-in-aid or assistance from the State Governments.
(8) Anti-ragging committees and squads shall be forthwith formed by the institutions and it shall be the job of the committee or the squad, as the
case may be, to see that the Committee's recommendations, particularly those noted above, are observed without exception and if it is
noticed that there is any deviation, the same shall be forthwith brought to the notice of this Court.
(9) The Committee constituted
pursuant to the order of
this Court shall continue to monitor
the functioning of the anti-ragging
committees and the squads to be formed. They shall also monitor the implementation
of the recommendations to which reference has been made above.
The All India
Institute of Medical Sciences requests all students, parents and guardians to go
through these directives and co-operate in the implementation of the directives
of the Honourable Supreme Court of India. It is hoped that this will signal an end
to the menace of ragging. Strict action shall be taken in accordance with the directives
in case any student is found to indulge in ragging.