Learn about
Remember | Register | Forgot Password?
Bookmark This Page   RSS Feeds  Follow On Twitter

 

         
    

Home > News > Constitutional Law > Cases under Stay Orders



Please Wait ..



Cases under Stay Orders

By : Guest on 24 May 2012
PRO CHAT CALL
Print Print this Report Abuse
 


 

Grant of stay orders in civil and criminal cases is part of judicial proceedings and Courts have been vested with inherent powers in this regard under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. So also, hearing and disposal of Court cases under various laws fall within the domain of judiciary. Giving this information in written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha recently, Minister of Law & Justice, Shri Salman Khurshid, said that no day-to-day records of court proceedings are possible to maintain at different stages centrally.

 

He further informed the House that in a recent judgement in the case of Imtiyaz Ahmed Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors, the Supreme Court had the occasion to look in to the issue of grant of stay orders by the High Courts during investigation or trial in criminal matters. In this case, the Supreme Court has inter-alia observed as follows:

 

(i)         Such an extraordinary power has to be exercised with due caution and circumspection;

 

(ii)        Once such a power is exercised, High Court should not lose sight of the case where it has exercised its extraordinary power of staying investigation and trial; and

 

(iii)       High Court should make it a point of finally disposing of such proceeding as early as possible but preferably within six months from the date the stay order is issued.

Source : ,

back to the top

You need to be logged in to post comment

Comments (4)




Suresh Sharma

Suresh Sharma

Wrote on 06 June 2012

It's a good news but the caution is not being taken in issuiyng a status quo/stay order by the High court and also not taking any step to disposing off either-the parties who had this Order in their favour are at great benefits and taking undue advantgaes being advocates themselves. How could we stop this happening in the first place? Probably Hon'ble judges are not taking due care in decison making and reviewing the cases properly before issuing the Stay Order, not even have given any chance to party to say anything in his defence before the Order has been issued( i am aware of this happening in one case)




R J PRAKASHAN

R J PRAKASHAN

Wrote on 04 June 2012

It's indeed a good news for all, but would request the owner to atleast give the citation of the case or the date of judgement. It would be more beneficial. Thanks and Regards




dr g balakrishnan

dr g balakrishnan

Wrote on 28 May 2012

IT IS A SETTLED LAW IN T. ASHOK PAI V CIT (2007)161 TAXMAN 340, 2121 TR 11 (SC) -' A MERE OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE WOULD NOT ACT AS SUPPRESSIO VERI OR SUGGESTIO FALSI'. YET THE TAX A Os MISUSE THE TAX LAWS U/S SEC 374 R/W 371(1)(C) WITH EXPN 1. ASSEESSES ARE IRRESPONSIBLY HARASSED, UNLESS CIT APPEALS) OR ITAT DELIVERS PROPER DECISIONS ARE DELAYED AND ASSEESSE IS HARASSED AND MENTALLY AFFECTED. S C FOUND ITAT MOSTLY DELIVERED GOOD PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENTS. YET T CANNOT LEAVE THINGS AT THE HANDS OF THESE TRIBUNALS, AS LONG AS AOs ARE NOT MADE TO PAY DAMAGES FOR WRONG APPLICATION OF MIND BUT THAT IS NOT GOING TO TAKE PLACE, BUT VICARIOUS LIABILITY IS FASTENED ON REVENUE, THINGS ARE NOT GOING TO IMPROVE. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES 'STAYS' NEED BE THERE AND YET THE COURTS ESSENTIALLY SEE WHETHER NATURAL JUSTICE IS SINCERELY ADOPTED BY AOs. TODAY NATURAL JUSTICE IS A CAUSALITY AT THE HANDS OF DEPARTMENTS, MAY BE DUE TO THEIR OWN COMMITMENTS OTHER THAN PUBLIC INTEREST WHICH PUBLIC INTEREST THOUGH VITAL IN DEMOCRACY NUT YET NOT WELL LOOKED AFTER, SO JUDICIARY NEED TO PLAY ITS PART TO SETTLE THAT WAY S C HELD THAT DELAY ITSELF DENIES JUSTICE AND SO BE IT SERVED THE STAY MATTERS MAY BE DECIDED FASTER VERY JUDICIOUSLY. SEERAL CONSTITUTIONAL BENCHES QUOTED SEVERAL U S / U K / AUSTRALIAN / CANADIAN JUDGEMENTS WHILE CONSIDERING INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES, THOUGH LEGISLATURE INTENT IS 'PUBLIC INTEREST' IS PARAMOUNT!


<



More news from this category










Quick Links



Browse By Category



Subscribe to News Feed
Enter your email to receive News Updates: