The genesis of the case of the prosecution was that one Shama Parveen was living in House No.A-32/15, Main Road No.66, Maujpur, that while she was using the first floor as her residential premises she had her own shop in the ground floor where she wa
...
on 30 April 2013 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dated 25.04.2007 by which the High Court dismissed the Criminal Appeal No.403 of 2005 and confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant for
...
on 05 November 2012 | by
Apurba Ghosh
| More
Two orders of the High Court of Karnataka dated 16th April, 2012 and 28th May, 2012
upholding the rejection of two separate applications made by the appellant herein for certified
copies or in the alternative for inspection of certain unmarked and
...
on 29 September 2012 | by
Praveen Sharma
| More
These appeals have been preferred by the second accused. Though, in all eight persons were accused of the alleged offences, records reveal that accused Nos. 7 and 8 were absconding even at the time of filing of the charge sheet and hence as many as s
...
on 17 September 2012 | by
Apurba Ghosh
| More
The appellant is being prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 7 & 13 (1) read with Section 13(1)(D) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, before the Special Judge for CBI cases at Hyderabad. Around the time the prosecution concluded its e
...
on 13 August 2012 | by
Apurba Ghosh
| More
The short case of the prosecution is that on 06.06.2001, H.C. Brij Pal (PW 11), who was posted in the PCR, received an information at about 10.35 PM that firing is taking place at Savitri Nagar near a sweet shop. Accordingly, PW 11 alongwith other po
...
on 17 July 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
The case of the complainant is that on 10/9/2001, the accused and his wife jointly borrowed a sum of Rs.5 lakhs from him and executed a promissory note in his favour. The accused also issued a cheque dated 14/5/2002 in favour of the complainant towar
...
on 10 July 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
Facts giving rise to the commission of the offence by the appellants and their eventual conviction have been set out in the judgment under appeal which need not be recounted again especially because notice in this appeal was issued by us limited to t
...
on 07 July 2012 | by
Apurba Ghosh
| More
My attention has been drawn to Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and it has been argued that no reasons for summoning an accused person need be given. I feel that under Section 204 aforesaid, a Magistrate has to form an opinion that there
...
on 02 July 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
As per the case of the prosecution, the petitioners, who are stated to be the Directors of M/s Sunair Hotels Limited, approached M/s VLS Finance Limited around December, 1994 with a proposal to finance a hotel project likely to be set up in Gol Marke
...
on 26 June 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
|
