The appellant herein, Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as `the insurer’), is a government company, which is in the business of insuring exporters. Respondent, M/s Garg Sons International, on 23.3.1995 purcha
...
on 24 April 2013 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
The facts very briefly are that the appellant-bank sanctioned Derivatives/Forward Contracts facility to respondent no.1 upto a limit of Rs.2,00,00,000/- (rupees two crores) only for the purpose of hedging foreign currency exposures by its letter date
...
on 22 April 2013 | by
Bijoy Paul
| More
Facts:
The department has filed this appeal for assessment year 2007-08 against order dated 2.11.2010 of ld CIT(A)-1, Mumbai. None appeared on behalf of assessee in spite of notice served through ld D.R. as per the report of the Assessing Officer
...
on 05 October 2012 | by
Praveen Sharma
| More
The Appellant herein as landlord filed a suit for eviction against the respondent company on the ground of default in making payment of the rents and also on grounds of reasonable requirement, in the City Civil Court at Calcutta, under the provisions
...
on 29 August 2012 | by
Apurba Ghosh
| More
The facts in brief needs to be stated for answering the issues raised. They are: In the case of Purbanchal Cables (C.A. No. 2348 of 2003), the supplier is the manufacturer of Aluminium Conductors Steel Reinforced (for short “ACSR”) for various specif
...
on 20 August 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
In sequel to orders passed by this Court with the earnest efforts of Mediators, namely, Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate and Mr. Pawan Thakur, Advocate, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The parties have jointly placed on reco
...
on 19 July 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
In the Pension Scheme, several parameters for existing members, like date of birth of member in service and on calculating the age as on 15.11.1995 for categorizing them in groups are provided which was also considered from the date of joining of his
...
on 11 July 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
The petitioner submits that both Shri N.A. Palkhivala and Shri D.S. Seth are no more and therefore the arbitration clause in the agreement does not survive. It was pointed out that Shri N.A. Palkhivala was named in the agreement since he was the Chai
...
on 25 June 2012 | by
Diganta Paul
| More
Company Petition No.95 of 2004 was a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) vide which sanction of this Court to the scheme of Amalgamation of Indrama Investment Private Limited (transfer
...
on 19 June 2012 | by
Apurba Ghosh
| More
Facts -
The petitioner by way of Agreement transferred land to the respondent - the Collector, Porbander , Revenue Department, State of Gujarat said lands were transferred to the respondent without prior permission of the Collector and as such the p
...
on 14 June 2012 | by
Praveen Sharma
| More
|
