Property Law Judgements

Displaying 10 - 20 of 101 in 11 pages

Non discloser house property income means evasion of Municipal Tax and may cause penalty on the Landlord

 13 December 2011

The dispute began when the Municipal Corporation of Delhi proposed to enhance, with effect from 01.04.1999, the rateable value from the existing rateable value of `11,400/- to `1,50,000/- on account of letting of the ground floor. It be highlighted t

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   2030 hits

Property belong to the HUF should be distributed between the Coparcener equally

 10 December 2011

Suit CS(OS) No. 985/2002 has been filed by Shri Rajender Shanker against his brother Shri Devendra Shanker seeking partition of the estate of their father late Shri Damodar Dass Mathur alleged to be comprising of house No.104, Jor Bagh, New Delhi, in

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   5145 hits

If the suit not filed in the Court define u/s 2(4) of B.P.T Act 1950 than Sec 50 and 51 will not be attracted

 24 November 2011

The facts are not in dispute and are very brief. The Respondents filed RCS No.1002 of 1998 against the Appellants in the Civil Court at Pune for permanent injunction from disturbing the possession of the Plaintiffs Trustees over the suit property. Th

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   3835 hits

Proceeding under Section 145 does not Purports to decide right, title and interest of the parties to the disputes

 24 November 2011

The case of the petitioner is that on the basis of police report a proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. was initiated against the petitioner 1st party and opposite party no. 2 to 6 along with the father of opposite party no. 7 as second party. The di

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   2630 hits

Principles of res judicata applies also as between two stages in the same litigation

 24 November 2011

Shorn of unnecessary details, a few facts which are necessary to be cited for the adjudication of the above Petition can be stated thus: The Respondent No.1 is the original Plaintiff and the Petitioners herein are the original Defendants. The Respond

Posted in Property Law 1 comments |   2260 hits

In determination of Consideration for Land Acquisition Deduction all together should not exceed 75 percent on market value

 24 November 2011

Gulbarga Development Authority, consequent upon its desire to acquire land for raising a residential layout, issued a preliminary notification under section 15(1) of the City Improvement Trust Board Act, 1976 on 13.5.1982. Through the aforesaid notif

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   1584 hits

Sale deed contrary to Injunction is not a valid deed even though the applicant entitle to invoked Court jurisdiction under Sec 536(2) of Companies Act 1956

 24 November 2011

Present applications have been filed against the impugned orders passed by Mr. J. P. Aggarwal, one man Committee appointed by this Court rejecting their claims in respect of plots in JVG Hills Layout, Kondhapur Village, Hyderabad In view of the orde

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   1665 hits

As per Sec 62 of Evidence Act 1872 carbon copy is Primary Evidence and rightly to be exhibited

 22 November 2011

The Petitioner is the Original Plaintiff in RAD Suit No.35 of 1998 which has been filed in the Court of Small Causes at Mumbai under Section 28 of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947. It is the case of the Plaintiff that he is the monthly tenant of the Defenda

Posted in Property Law 2 comments |   5990 hits

As per sec 297(2)(g) of IT Act !961 proceeding completed before April 1962 is to be dealt with under the old provision

 14 November 2011

The High Court, vide its impugned Judgment and Order dated 25.07.2005, has declared that Section 87(m)(ii) (b) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India insofar as it seeks to deny the benefit of the ‘Kar Viv

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   1127 hits

Food corporation of India can not be covered by the definition of Sec 3 (1) of the Companies Act. and the acquisition can not be consider acquisition for purpose of Company

 14 November 2011

On the requisition of Cholan Roadways Corporation Limited, Kumbakonam (for short, ‘the Corporation’) for making available land for expansion of their depot, particularly for a workshop, at Chidambaram, the State Government of Tamil Nadu (for short, ‘

Posted in Property Law |    0 comments |   1688 hits


  LAWyersclubindia Menu