LAWyersclubindia LCI
Login  Register
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Presumption of joint family

SANJAY DIXIT ,
  17 June 2008       Share Bookmark
Court :
Supreme Court of India
Brief :

Citation :
Thimmappa Rai v. Ramanna Rai & Ors. decided on May 9, 2007


In a suit for partition, the court has observed:
The fact that persons were residing together or processing some cultivating lands jointly, by itself would not give rise to a presumption that there existed a joint family fund having a joint nucleus. There being absence of any ‘joint family’ governed by the school of Hindu Law, there could not have existed any joint fund, which conceptualizes existence of a nucleus.



 
"Loved reading this piece by SANJAY DIXIT?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"


Join our Telegram group
Join our Whatsapp group

Published in Family Law
Views :
 Report Abuse

Previous
Next

Comments



Laws Laws Follow us



Latest Judgments


  1. High Court Rules Compassionate Appointment Should Be Granted Based On Financial Distress Rather Than Inherited Entitlement
  2. The Supreme Court Re-defines The Interim Order That Maintains A Delicate Balance Between Justice, Efficiency, And Fairness Under The Prevention Of Corruption Act.
  3. Protecting Life And Environment: Supreme Court Recognises The Right Against Adverse Effects Of Climate Change Under Article 21
  4. Retrospective Regularisation Allowed As Employer Ignored Years Of Service, Even When Plea Made After A Significant Amount Of Time; Difference Between Casual Worker And Daily Worker: J&k High Court
  5. Kerala High Court Recognises The Right To Play And To Have A Playground In Educational Institutions As Fundamental Rights Of Pupils
  6. Nomination Disclosure Controversy: Supreme Court Validates Mla Karikho Kri-s Election As It Was Not Adversely Affected By The Nondisclosure Of The Assets Of The Candidate
  7. High Court Rules That A Detention Order Passed Without Making The Detenue Explicitly Aware Of His Right To Make Representation Was Invalid
  8. Defamation Ruling: Upholding Reputation And Fair Trial Process
  9. Witnesses In A Criminal Proceeding Can Be Recalled For Re-examination In Matters Only Where It Is Compulsory To Do So For Fair Delivery Of Justice.
  10. The Computation Of Capital Gain Prioritizes Fair Market Value Over Share Valuation, Requiring Shares To Be Valued Under Rule 1d Of The Wealth Tax Rules: Jammu And Kashmir And Ladakh High Court.'

More »

Submit Judgment

Stay updated with latest Posts!


Browse by Category