|
Replied in : Re:Rti payments by cash
|
| Posted
by : madan mohan nagar on 07 February 2012
|
| |
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Cognizance by magistrate
|
| Posted
by : Pawan Kumar on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Dear friends, one such problem also persisted to me when i was seeking interim bail of an accused. the Magistrate asked me to show any provision which provides for "interim bail".......you can't help with such guys.....but afterall have to tackle wid them wid ur skills...as these kind of Magistrates occupy their chair in courtroom not to dispense with jusitice but to trammel an ongoing course...
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Re Punishment under section 498a should be less than 6 month
|
| Posted
by : balwinder s bains on 07 February 2012
|
| |
1. Gentlemen, please try to put your selves in the shoes of those parents whose daughters or brothers whose sisters are harrassed by the greedy animals (it is surely insult of a human being to name such speicies as huma being). One can only realise the pain of physical & mental agony faced if he or she himself or herself get subjected to that. We are familiar with many cases where the newly wed brides are killed, burned or hanged or forced to get themselves hanged. Do you want such butchers to go scot free, Freinds it is not very easy to collect the evidence and get these people convicted as normally they wont leave it behind.
2. You will not believe that there are the people on our planet / earth those first torture not only the daughter in laws but the infants still in the womb. After that it does not end here if some times the husband dies due to his bl**dy bad habits, drinlking and taking drugs etc etc. The inlaws refusses to even accept the child their grandson and refuse to give him or her any share from the ancestral property. They leave the kid at the mercy of our polluted system, would you like to take sides with such goons or would promise to stand by the poor kid and the harrassed mother. Advise what punishment would you like for such butchers.
3. Yes, there cant be denial of having very few cases where the brides playing such immoral games, but believe me there cant be smoke without fire, no woman would like to destroy her and her childerens life without unavoaidable reasons.
4. Let .us stand for the justice and root out this epidemic called as dowry, This is the root cause of girls being killed, hanged, burned or forced to go for suiccides. This is the reason the female foeticide taking place in your beloved INDIA. This is the root cause behind very low gender ratio inequality.
YOU NEED TO STAND UP, BEING SON OF GREAT SOIL. BHARAT MATA WILL ADMIRE YOU.
GOD BLESS YOU ALL
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Re Punishment under section 498a should be less than 6 month
|
| Posted
by : balwinder s bains on 07 February 2012
|
| |
1. Gentlemen, please try to put your selves in the shoes of those parents whose daughters or brothers whose sisters are harrassed by the greedy animals (it is surely insult of a human being to name such speicies as huma being). One can only realise the pain of physical & mental agony faced if he or she himself or herself get subjected to that. We are familiar with many cases where the newly wed brides are killed, burned or hanged or forced to get themselves hanged. Do you want such butchers to go scot free, Freinds it is not very easy to collect the evidence and get these people convicted as normally they wont leave it behind.
2. You will not believe that there are the people on our planet / earth those first torture not only the daughter in laws but the infants still in the womb. After that it does not end here if some times the husband dies due to his bl**dy bad habits, drinlking and taking drugs etc etc. The inlaws refusses to even accept the child their grandson and refuse to give him or her any share from the ancestral property. They leave the kid at the mercy of our polluted system, would you like to take sides with such goons or would promise to stand by the poor kid and the harrassed mother. Advise what punishment would you like for such butchers.
3. Yes, there cant be denial of having very few cases where the brides playing such immoral games, but believe me there cant be smoke without fire, no woman would like to destroy her and her childerens life without unavoaidable reasons.
4. Let .us stand for the justice and root out this epidemic called as dowry, This is the root cause of girls being killed, hanged, burned or forced to go for suiccides. This is the reason the female foeticide taking place in your beloved INDIA. This is the root cause behind very low gender ratio inequality.
YOU NEED TO STAND UP, BEING SON OF GREAT SOIL. BHARAT MATA WILL ADMIRE YOU.
GOD BLESS YOU ALL
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Cognizance by magistrate
|
| Posted
by : Pawan Kumar on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Do one thing buddy- say that you reached to police station but they are not lodging a report and ask the court the exercise its jurisdiction u/s 156(3), as Mr. Harbhajan Singh has advised. |
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Demand deposits
|
| Posted
by : Amit Khandekar on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Hi,
The concept and idea behind the query is explained in the book - Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles by Jesus Huerta de Soto and is freely available at http://mises.org/document/2745. Its review is available at http://www.amazon.com/Money-Bank-Credit-Economic-Cycles/dp/1933550392.
The proposal at first seems paradoxical, and the impact if implemented is mind boggling. If one understands, the cost incurred is much more than the benefits advocated by monetary interventionists, one can then think of phasing out the impact over a period of time, so that the system has some time to adjust.
Hoping for some guidance from the experts on this forum. Thanks in advance
Regards,
Amit
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Compounding of an offence under section 320 c.r.p.c
|
| Posted
by : munnu on 07 February 2012
|
| |
yes leave of the court is required in ofences compoundable with leave.
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Compounding of an offence under section 320 c.r.p.c
|
| Posted
by : munnu on 07 February 2012
|
| |
for compounding an offence consent of accused not required..compounding is not pari meteria with compromise....its a unilateral process....the witness who is real aggrievd can compound the offence.
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Remedy for ia filed-time duration for passing judgment.
|
| Posted
by : munnu on 07 February 2012
|
| |
get an order from high court fot directing the trial court to disposs of the matter on time boud manner....in my view there is no other remedy for this querry
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Re Re How to prove for bigamy case
|
| Posted
by : **Victim** on 07 February 2012
|
| |
@ Tajobsindia thanks for providing free gyan.
|
| |
|
New Topic : Challenging a notarized agreement
|
| Posted
by : Venkat on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Respected members,
Please advise me on the following situation.
Mr 'X' has two daughters 'A' and 'B'. Out of the immovable property that 'X' has, a minor part he got it out of familly division after 'X''s father expired and rest is his self acquired. 'X' had gifted major part of his self acquired property to kids of his daughter 'B'. After few months 'X" under gone a major surgery and he got into mental trauma there after and no signs of recovery.
It is at this time, daughter 'A' raised a dispute that all the property is joint property, earned using nucleus of joint property and thrown into hotch potch, taking advantage of 'X' health condition. To close the dispute, with intervention of well wishers, the two daughters 'A' and 'B' and X's wife and kids of the two daughters entered into an mutual agreement (duly stamped, eight Rs20 stamp papers) that some part of the already gifted property will be given to 'A' and/or her kids and the remaining (not gifted) will be shared among all as mentioned in the agreement. This agreement then got notarized.
The above agreement has been signed by the two daghters 'A' and 'B', X's wife and kids of the two daughters but WAS NOT SIGNED BY X AS HE IS IN MENTAL TRAUMA. And after few days 'X' is expired. After that gift deeds, partition deed are executed and got registered with property divisions as mentioned in the agreement. Based on these facts....
1) If 'A' or 'B' or X's wife were to rise a dispute again saying inequal propery division, will it sustain?
2) What is the value of the above mutual agreement? Will it be accepted as an evidence that the parties agreed to said property division?
3) is the agreement is legally binding to enforce the said property division again? (some of the deeds executed after the agreement are not valid per law and needs to be/about to get revoked)
3) Can the agreement be challenged, as it has division of property owned by 'X"? If so to what extent is not legally binding? Note that the agreement is not signed by 'X' who is the absolute owner of the residual property at the time of entering into agreement
Thanks in advance.
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Lost original property papers
|
| Posted
by : Member (Account Deleted) on 07 February 2012
|
| |
minasu bhadra sir. are u online? can i get an id where i can char with you regarding this problem now?
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Congrats to Chitranjan Sawant for Featured...
|
| Posted
by : @@pragya### on 07 February 2012
|
| |
|
| |
|
New Topic : Defamation
|
| Posted
by : swagath on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Dear sir/madam i have filed a defamation case by myself as a party in person on a person who has given a defamataory statement in press meet by him aggainst me now magistarte is asking for the transcriptttion copy of the news paper even though i have given the original news paper so now i have to give a notice to the editor of the news paper could any one kindly give a sample draft so that i can give notice to ediotr for giving the press note or the transcriptttion copy. Thanking Swagath Law student
|
| |
|
New Topic : Defamation
|
| Posted
by : swagath on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Dear sir/madam
i have filed a defamation case by myself as a party in person on a person who has given a defamataory statement in press meet by him aggainst me
now magistarte is asking for the transcripttion copy of the news paper even though i have given the original news paper so now i have to give a notice to the editor of the news paper
could any one kindly give a sample draft so that i can give notice to ediotr for giving the press note or the transcripttion copy. Thanking
Swagath
Law student
|
| |
|
New Topic : Re:Power of attorney-no agency in the matter of commission of a
|
| Posted
by : Ibrahim Deshmukh on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Hi Beni Prasad
What exactly is your legal query or comment on the whole judgment you have posted on the forum ?
Please be brief in putting your legal query, if at all, which may enable legal fraternity to share their views with.
Ibrahim Deshmukh
Legal Consultant
ibdesh@gmail.com
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Re 125 crpc liabilties
|
| Posted
by : harrassedby498a on 07 February 2012
|
| |
What can be the cross examination questions that can be asked in the trial of 125 Crpc to trap her that she bites the dust and the maintanance can be made minimum.Below are the details of the B****h.
1.Well Qaulified Engineer (Has hidden the same in the Petetion and i have her Edu. Certificates of her highest degree)
2.Undergone many trainings in the field of IT & Banking sector (Got the certificates with me).
3.Has the Job Experience before and after marriage ,But now left the job intentionally(Got the offer letters with me).
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Hindu marriage amendment act 2010
|
| Posted
by : asmita0009 on 07 February 2012
|
| |
Actually to maintain matrimonial relations are co-responsibilities of Husband and wife. To save family is important for indian society. But in India due to section 498, dowry related cases reducing. But now the Husband and inlaws who r not have moral responsibilities, have started new trend . they are doing mental harrassment . They know very well that in India court matters are not giving justice to women, if women will go to court she will have to wait for years and years. Court are giving only 2-5 % maintenace to the women . Further there are some special laws to get back stridhan and as per Hindu customs stridhan is righ of women however to get back it from stridhan they have to face lots of difficulties , long court procedure ,police complain etc.. After getting orders for nominal amount husband are not giving maintence. Some advocates are also not taking proper interest etc.
all this happens because maintence, stridhan, devorce related laws are not proper. All these laws are creats hardship to women. sometimes women thinaks that compare to Husband's misbehaviour laws creates lots of difficulties in there life. So, in most of the cases women have to take the decision of sattlement on nominal amount and women are not getting proper justice.
So, all these matter should be considered by govt and should have to make laws strong for women. i have experienced all this in my own personal life.
|
| |
|
Replied in : Re:Maintenance under crpc 125 & dv act
|
| Posted
by : Krishna on 07 February 2012
|
| |
My mother had the regular bail, while I had a conditional bail.
we don't have the bail papers with us. should we approach the court to get the bail papers or the advocate? pls advise.
~Krishna
|
| |
|
New Topic : Remedy for ia filed-time duration for passing judgment.
|
| Posted
by : amit on 07 February 2012
|
| |
I have a query ..In a suit for trial in OS-Partition suit ... wherein following the lodging of plaint.. along with filing of written statement by the defendant.An IA if filed for the ammendment of Original plaint ( filed by me ) ...with no much constructive defense being set up against the IA and the amendments so pleaded are all based on documentary evidence(submitted along with the IA ) ...5 months since IA for amendment filed and 3 months since written arguement filed.
My concerns are :
1. What would be the time constraint on the Judge to allow the IA filed for amendment.
2. Any such recent ruling of the SC is there or otherwise in the existing law which holds and binds the judge to pass an order to amend the plaint in limited period of time even after having filed with the written arguement has been filed with.
3. If any other options are there ..kindly suggest .
With regards
|
| |