Information against income of wife is obtained under right to information Act
Before this Court, the learned Advocate for the applicant attempted to produce an information collected by him under the Right to Information Act wherein it is mentioned that respondent no. 1 works in the institution by name Krushi Vidhnyan Kentra, Selsura, Taluka Deoli, District Wardha in the name and style as ku. Kavita V. Ingale, as Junior Stenographer and earns a sum of Rs. 8000/- per month. Perusal of the impugned order, would go to show that this aspect was not made over to the learned trial Judge by documentary evidence and that is how the said aspect has not been considered by the learned trial Judge. Hence, the stand of the applicant that respondent no. 1 is gainfully employed and earns Rs. 8000/- per month prima facie could not have been accepted. Hence, the said stand cannot be considered while deciding correctness of the order passed by learned trial Judge as well as learned Additional Sessions Judge. Needless to mention that if the applicant has any material to make an application for modification of the order already granted, he would be able to do so by applying for modification of the order.
Bombay High Court
Nandkishor S/O Damodar ... vs May Include A Relief For Issuance ... on 5 August, 2009
Bench: R.Y. Ganoo
https://www.lawweb.in/2013/09/information-against-income-of-wife-is.html
