Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

swajeet saran (President)     12 March 2013

Plaintiff were not alive on date of filing..concealed facts

A SUIT WAS FILED IN A SESSIONS COURT BY MR. A ( POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF 10 CO-OWNERS OF PROPERTY) AND 10 OTHERS AS PLAINTIFFS, IN 2011. THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HAD BEEN EXECUTED IN 1992-93. NOW IN DEC.2012 HON'BLE COURT HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE DEFENDANTS THAT THREE OF THE PLAINTIFFS WERE NOT ALIVE ON DATE OF FILING SUIT. THIS FACT WAS CONCEALED BY MR.A, THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, BUT NOW HE HAS SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR THE DECEASED PLAINTIFFS. THE DEFENDANT HAS PRAYED THAT THE SUIT BE TREATED AS NULL & VOID AB-INITIO. PLEASE ADVISE AND REFER ANY RULINGS ON THIS ASPECT.

In the above matter, please advise whether in a suit for recovery of arrears of rent & eviction for the immovable property filed by 10 plaintiffs as co-owners of the property, the decree if any passed, will be divisible amongst the plaintiffs or not.



Learning

 1 Replies

Rajendra Shrivastava (advocate)     12 March 2013

 decree is divisable as well ashouse. decreeis abinitiovoid because "a" concealed the fact. . it can be challenged.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register