Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Abhijit Banerjee (HR)     31 May 2018

Query on section 138 of the negotiable instruments act

Please help me resolving the below query-

  • Company A  ( a Pvt Ltd company ) supplies materials to compnay B ( a Pvt Ltd company )
  • Company B issues a cheque to company A against supply of materials 
  • The cheque is signed by Mr X , one of the directors of Company B . The other 2 directors of company B are Mr Y and Mr Z
  • Before the cheque is deposited , Mr X expires
  • Company A deposits the cheque on due date , the cheque is dishonored on the ground of " Insufficient fund "
  • Company A issues a notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to  Company B and its other Directors  Mr Y and Mr Z
  • Since Compamy B does not pay against the dishonoured cheque within the stipulated date , Company A files a case against Compnay B under NI Act

The query is as below :

1. Since Mr X had expired , Company A did not include his name in the notice u/s 138 . Is it legally right ?

2. Since Mr X had expired before the cheque was presented for payment , can section 138 be enforced?



Learning

 1 Replies

R.Ramachandran (Advocate)     31 May 2018

Filing of the complaint against Company B is quite right.

Other issues are irrelevant, in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Apart from that Company "A" should also simultaneously file a summary suit under Order 37 for recovery of money.  That is a sure way to recover the money.

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register