Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Surya Bansal   05 October 2017

False criminal and cyber crimes fir, stay on bussiness

IT act 74, 66d and IPC 420, 120(b) against 6 person of separate common bussiness of spreading information of hourly steel reports to customers who ask for this service. And the manfacturers of steel comoditiess used their influence to file a false FIR without any evidence resulting in thousands of customers falling in tricky hands of manufacturers and the bussinessmen without work exhausting the resources on the lawsuit. Quashing and two writs are filed against the FIR and the involved persons (For eg. SSP of this district, SHO, IO etc.). Even after directions of court in accordance to writ for investigation, the IO still warns and forces us to stop the work resulting in unemployment. His excuse is that the case has criminal status so we cant resume our work till it is disposed off or quashed. the quash date is 2 feb, 2018 (started from 4 aug then 11 sep, 14 sep, 3 oct) What can we do... please help!



Learning

 4 Replies

manoj   06 October 2017

call me to solve your query at cell no 8686159292

P. Venu (Advocate)     06 October 2017

The facts, as posted, are less than convincing.

Vijay Raj Mahajan (Advocate)     07 October 2017

Move application in the High Court seeking permission to resume work as that doesn't affect the quashing petition but if affecting the business and causing unemployment for many, in the larger interest of those who are unemployed, resumption of work should be allowed.

Vijay Raj Mahajan (Advocate)     07 October 2017

Move application in the High Court seeking permission to resume work as that doesn't affect the quashing petition but if affecting the business and causing unemployment for many, in the larger interest of those who are unemployed, resumption of work should be allowed.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register