Property

senior

according to me this is a small issue which can be sorted out by convinsing her.

 
Reply   
 

I know, how can the property can be demolished before signing What else can be done sir by law
 
Reply   
 


senior

pl call me

 
Reply   
 

File suit for partition. U &Ur mother be plaintiffs Ur sister be defendAnt.
 
Reply   
 

File suit for partition. U &Ur mother be plaintiffs Ur sister be defendAnt.
 
Reply   
 

Tku sir, if I file a suit, how long does it take and what will be the result
 
Reply   
 
FIN

Your posts affirm that you are all Hindu/Hindu Succession Laws apply in your case and your decased Father (title holder) has not left any valid WILL.

 

Succession opens on date of death; by inheritance or by testamentary succession (by valid WILL).

In case of Hindu male dying without disposing her estate/property in her life time by a valid/registered deed the 1st right is of ClassI legal heirs i.e Mother (if alive as on date of death), Wife (if alive as on date of death), sons, daughters……

 

In case of deceased Hindu woman dying without disposing her estate/property in her life time by a valid/registered deed ClassI,II is not applicable rather nature and source of property matters.

 

If the property is self acquired/earned/absolute in the hands of Hindu woman the 1st right is of her husband (if alive as on date of death) and sons, daughters…………

If property is acquired from husband side 1st right is of her sons, daughters…………and if sons, daughters are not available then legal heirs of husband..

If property is acquired from parents side 1st right is of her sons, daughters…………and if sons, daughters are not available then legal heirs of father..

 
Reply   
 
FIN

GO thru; Hindu Succession Act; 22, 23

The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005

Supreme Court of India

Narashimaha Murthy vs Smt. Susheelabai & Ors on 17 April, 1996

Equivalent citations: 1996 AIR 1826, 1996 SCC (3) 644

Author: K Ramaswamy

Bench: Ramaswamy, K.

 

Supreme Court of India : Prakash & Ors. Vs. Phulavati & Ors; [SLP (C) Nos.21814 of 2008, 18744 of 2010, 28702-28703 of 2010, 28471 of 2011, 4217-4218 of 2012, 1299-1300 of 2013, 17577-17578 of 2013, 19816 of 2014, 5619 of 2015, 3805 of 2008, 9390 of 2015, 5680 of 2015, 35209 of 2011 and 15557-15558 of 2015 and SLP. (C) ....15560 of 2015]

 [Civil Appeal No.7217 of 2013]

 

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.

 

Supreme Court of India

Danamma @ Suman Surpur vs Amar on 1 February, 2018

Author: A Sikri

Bench: A Bhushan, A Sikri

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

 

                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

 

                                      CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 188-189 OF 2018

                                      [@SLP(C) Nos. 10638-10639 of 2013]

 
Reply   
 
FIN

 

     SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

   Sita Ram Bhama Vs. Ramvatar Bhama

 

[Civil Appeal No................of 2018 arising out of SLP (C) No.11067 of 2017]

 

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

 

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963; Article; 109, 110

 

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

Search Forum:








×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu