Regards to every body
I seek help on the following issue.
A government employee subsequently after superannuation found that he was entitled for a post higher than that from which he superannuated.
The petitioner was denied this benefit without any specific reason.
Now it was admitted by the department but the finance department denied the pay fixation.
It is also a fact that two of the petitioners subordinates before their superannuation received the benefit.
A brief study revels that it was done willingly by the then authorities.
Is there any judgment of the apex court on this point?