Send Your Feedback
Lawyersclubindia Mobile
Remember | Register | Forgot Password?
Bookmark This Page   RSS Feeds  Follow On Twitter

 



Forum Home > Criminal Law > crpc   Unanswered Threads Post New Topic


09 February 2010, 14:08   Report Abuse

Report Abuse / Feedback


Name
Email
Subject
Message

Verify Verify Code 
  

Note : The above form can be used to intimate the moderators regarding abuse of the platform.

sreenath cochin

student



[ Scorecard : 261]

.an eminent doctor who lured a women intoa path of immorality was convicted under sec 376 and was debarred ffrom practising for three years.what is the legality of the order.pls refer to relevant sections of crpc


Share This


09 February 2010, 21:36  

ANIL KUMAR MENON

ADVOCATE



[ Scorecard : 1156]

Debarring from practising for three years is not a punishment prescribed for the offence u/s 376.  Therefore it means no punishment has been imposed though found guilty.  Hence the order is not legal. Since the Judge has not passed sentance according to law s.235(2) Cr.p.c. the order will be set aside and the trial court would be directed to pass sentance according to law. 386(1) Cr.P.C.


Message thanked : 1 times



Follow us on Twitter
Find us on Facebook


Related Files


 

Previous
Next

Related Topics / Similar Threads

 

Post your reply for : crpc
Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies
Click here to login


Not a member yet ?? Click here to signup
Message


Subscribe to the latest topics :


Forum Home | Forum Portal | Control Center | Who is Where | Popular Threads | Today's Topic | Recent Posts | Today's Posts | Post New Topic | Thread With Files | Top Threads - Month | Unreplied Topics | Forum Stats