Learn about
Remember | Register | Forgot Password?
Bookmark This Page   RSS Feeds  Follow On Twitter

 

         
    



Please Wait ..


Discussion > Business Law > Corporate > WHEN COURTS DO NOT SANCTION A SCHEME?   Unanswered Threads Post New Topic

Pages : 1


There are 2 Replies to this message


Nirav Pankaj Shah


Corporate Laws and Indirect Taxation Laws Practitioner.
[ Scorecard : 36368]
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted On 23 April 2010 at 16:39 Report Abuse

 

If a compromise or arrangement is not bona fide but intended to cover misdeeds of delinquent directors, the Court shall not sanction the scheme [Pioneer Dyeing House Limited v. Dr. Shanker Vishnu Marathe (1967) 2 Comp. LJ 16]. If the object of the scheme is to prevent investigation or there is failure in the management of affairs of the company or disregard of law or withholding of material information from the meeting or the scheme is against public policy, the Court will not sanction the scheme [J.S. Davar v. Dr. S.V. Marathe, AIR 1967 Bom. 456 (DB)]. If it can be shown that the petition is made mala fide and motivated primarily to defeat the claims of certain creditors who had obtained decrees against the company, there was inordinate delay in making the application for sanctioning the scheme and certain information was withheld from the Company Court, the petition for sanctioning the scheme though approved by the creditors and shareholders was rejected [Richa Jain v. Registrar of Companies(1990) 69 Comp. Cas. 248 (Raj.)].

Thus, the following salient aspects emerge in every proposal containing a scheme of compromise or arrangement:

— Any scheme of compromise or arrangement that falls within the provisions of Sections 391 to 393 of the Act should receive sanction from the Court in order to become effective and binding.

— The scheme of compromise or arrangement should be prepared as a written document.

— It should be presented to the Court.

— Court will direct the convening of meetings of creditors or a class of them.

— Court will direct the convening of meetings of members or a class of them.

— Court gives opportunity to all concerned.

— Under Section 391(1) of the Act, the Court gives directions with regard to conducting of meetings.

— The Court also fixes the time and place of such meeting, and appoint a chairman of the meeting.

— The Court fixes the quorum and lays down the procedure to be followed at the meeting, including voting by proxy; determines the value of creditors or members and the persons to whom notice is to be given.

— The Court also gives directions to the chairman to report to the Court the result of the meeting within a given period.



Total thanks : 1 times


Rashi


Student
[ Scorecard : 68]
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted On 23 April 2010 at 17:49

Thank u sir. I feel,   u & some other members have made very easier to get knowledge and information about company law. Thanks alot Sir


Nirav Pankaj Shah


Corporate Laws and Indirect Taxation Laws Practitioner.
[ Scorecard : 36368]
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted On 23 April 2010 at 17:51

infact the main product is that we are learning.....the knowledge u get is a by-product........!@!@!@

Regards,



Total thanks : 1 times




Previous Thread
Previous
Next Thread
Next


Related Threads


Post your reply for WHEN COURTS DO NOT SANCTION A SCHEME?



Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to login


Not a member yet ?? Click here to signup

Message







    

  • This is a public forum. Avoid posting content which you do not wish to disclose in public.
  • Use thank button to convey your appreciation.
  • Maintain professionalism while posting and replying to topics.
  • Try to add value with your each post.





Subscribe to the latest topics :


Forum Home | Forum Portal | Control Center | Who is Where | Popular Threads | Today's Topic | Recent Posts | Today's Posts | Post New Topic | Thread With Files | Top Threads - Month | Unreplied Topics | Forum Stats