Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

vaishali   23 March 2016

Suit partition

MR “J’ MARRIED MRS “Z” IN 1940. SON MR R WAS BORN IN 1942 OUT OF THE WEDDING.

MRS “Z” DIED IN 1944

MR “J” REMARRIED MRS “K” IN 1948. HAD SON MR “P” AND DAUGHTER MRS “N’ FROM MRS “K”

MRS “K” PURCHASED PROPERTY (PLOT) IN 1952

MR “J’ DIED INTESTATE IN 1999

MRS “K” DIED INTESTATE IN 2010

CASE FILED BY STEPSON MR “R” ASKING HIS SHARE IN PROPERTY IN DEC 2012,WITH MR “P” AND MRS “N” AS DEFENDENTS (IN HIGH COURT)

MR “R” ARRNGED FOR AN ADVOCATE FOR MRS “N”

NO VAKALATNAMA NOR AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY MRS “N”

MRS “N” DIED IN JULY 2012

ISSUES FRAMED ON 24.09.2014, ONE OF THEM BEING WHETHER THE SUIT PROPERTY IS LIABLE TO BE PARTITIONED BETWEEN DEFENDANT NO.1 (MR “P”) AND DEFENDANT NO.2 (MRS “N”) TO THE EXCLUSION OF PLAINTIFF

MR “J’ MARRIED MRS “Z” IN 1940. SON MR R WAS BORN IN 1942 OUT OF THE WEDDING.

MRS “Z” DIED IN 1944

MR “J” REMARRIED MRS “K” IN 1948. HAD SON MR “P” AND DAUGHTER MRS “N’ FROM MRS “K”

MRS “K” PURCHASED PROPERTY (PLOT) IN 1952

MR “J’ DIED INTESTATE IN 1999

MRS “K” DIED INTESTATE IN 2010

CASE FILED BY STEPSON MR “R” ASKING HIS SHARE IN PROPERTY IN DEC 2012,WITH MR “P” AND MRS “N” AS DEFENDENTS (IN HIGH COURT)

MR “R” ARRNGED FOR AN ADVOCATE FOR MRS “N”

NO VAKALATNAMA NOR AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY MRS “N”

MRS “N” DIED IN JULY 2012

ISSUES FRAMED ON 24.09.2014, ONE OF THEM BEING WHETHER THE SUIT PROPERTY IS LIABLE TO BE PARTITIONED BETWEEN DEFENDANT NO.1 (MR “P”) AND DEFENDANT NO.2 (MRS “N”) TO THE EXCLUSION OF PLAINTIFF

MR “J’ MARRIED MRS “Z” IN 1940. SON MR R WAS BORN IN 1942 OUT OF THE WEDDING.

MRS “Z” DIED IN 1944

MR “J” REMARRIED MRS “K” IN 1948. HAD SON MR “P” AND DAUGHTER MRS “N’ FROM MRS “K”

MRS “K” PURCHASED PROPERTY (PLOT) IN 1952

MR “J’ DIED INTESTATE IN 1999

MRS “K” DIED INTESTATE IN 2010

CASE FILED BY STEPSON MR “R” ASKING HIS SHARE IN PROPERTY IN DEC 2012,WITH MR “P” AND MRS “N” AS DEFENDENTS (IN HIGH COURT)

MR “R” ARRNGED FOR AN ADVOCATE FOR MRS “N”

NO VAKALATNAMA NOR AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY MRS “N”

MRS “N” DIED IN JULY 2012

ISSUES FRAMED ON 24.09.2014, ONE OF THEM BEING WHETHER THE SUIT PROPERTY IS LIABLE TO BE PARTITIONED BETWEEN DEFENDANT NO.1 (MR “P”) AND DEFENDANT NO.2 (MRS “N”) TO THE EXCLUSION OF PLAINTIFF

MR “J’ MARRIED MRS “Z” IN 1940. SON MR R WAS BORN IN 1942 OUT OF THE WEDDING.

MRS “Z” DIED IN 1944

MR “J” REMARRIED MRS “K” IN 1948. HAD SON MR “P” AND DAUGHTER MRS “N’ FROM MRS “K”

MRS “K” PURCHASED PROPERTY (PLOT) IN 1952

MR “J’ DIED INTESTATE IN 1999

MRS “K” DIED INTESTATE IN 2010

CASE FILED BY STEPSON MR “R” ASKING HIS SHARE IN PROPERTY IN DEC 2012,WITH MR “P” AND MRS “N” AS DEFENDENTS (IN HIGH COURT)

MR “R” ARRNGED FOR AN ADVOCATE FOR MRS “N”

NO VAKALATNAMA NOR AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY MRS “N”

MRS “N” DIED IN JULY 2012

ISSUES FRAMED ON 24.09.2014, ONE OF THEM BEING WHETHER THE SUIT PROPERTY IS LIABLE TO BE PARTITIONED BETWEEN DEFENDANT NO.1 (MR “P”) AND DEFENDANT NO.2 (MRS “N”) TO THE EXCLUSION OF PLAINTIFF



Learning

 1 Replies

Adv. Yogen Kakade (+ 91 9225510883)     23 March 2016

seems like academic query


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register