Wife filed RCR petition and an application for interim maintenance u/s 24 HMA.
The trial Judge in the Lower Court ignored the SC direction that every Court must assess the feasibility of possible re-union of husband and wife through the process of meditation and the litigation must start only after a failed meditation.
What do I do in this case now? The trial already started without pre-litigation meditation. I anticipated that the Judge would exercise a meditation first.
The opposite side laywer was eager to start proceedings because he could earn money through the grant of the application in wife's favour for litigation expenses.
Advise needed!
