Thyagarajan is correct, live example is BCCI case ...
Can anyone comment on the below allegations whether these attract perjury or not ...
- The petitioner humbly submits that respondent is approaching the Honorable Court with false information and intentionally knowingly doing such false allegations to cause conviction of petitioner in the criminal case and also for the wrongful gains from honorable court. Due to false allegations in the criminal cases, petitioner lost the opportunities to serve our country. The false evidence/statements is causing serious damage to the normal life, reputation of the petitioner, also causing mental cruelty to the petitioner, also consuming and wasting petitioner’s time, life and energy. Also respondent is causing wastage of Honorable court’s time. Details of the offence as follows:
I. Petitioner humbly submit that respondent gave false evidence/statement in the honorable court by saying that the petitioner did harass the respondent by manhandling the respondent such way that respondent received physical injuries and got treated in hospital, with the help of respondent’s brother and her parents, at Bangalore and respondent left the matrimonial house at Bangalore and also gave false evidence that petitioner was not physically available to her parents and to her brother and also not available even on phone. Petitioner humbly submits that false evidence given by the respondent could cause conviction of petitioner in criminal case (FIR No.xx/2008) hence petitioner request the honorable court to take appropriate measures in the interest of justice.
II. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent’s above statements are false and contradicts with her own statement, her blood relatives statements and witnesses CrPC-161 statements given to the police during the FIR No.xx/2008, Kukatpally PS, crime final investigation report (charge sheet). Petitioner humbly submits that respondent’s false statements made petitioner’s brother-in-law as respondent in a criminal case U/s 498A, who never lived with respondent’s family at Bangalore.
III. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false evidence in the honorable court by saying that petitioner made the respondent house arrest and starved for food for two days at Bangalore. In contra, even on the last day and its previous day of the respondent stay at Bangalore, respondent did shopping with neighbors and friends. Despite petitioner’s request respondent left the matrimonial house and after 15 days made false complaint to police.
IV. Petitioner further submits that, respondent gave false evidence by saying that petitioner treated the respondent cruelty by not giving food for days together to get money by selling respondent property from the respondent. Petitioner humbly submits that this allegation is also part of the complaint (FIR No.xx/2008) made by respondent to the Kukatpally PS. As per the police final investigation report on FIR No.xx/2008, the said allegation is false and this false allegation is removed from the investigation report. Also none of the respondent’s relatives and witnesses statements, given to Kukatpally police, supported the respondent’s false statement. Petitioner submits that, respondent was engaged with neighbors and friends with many parties at Bangalore (marriage, birthday and picnic), was facilitated with good facilities at matrimonial home and never neglected at Bangalore.
V. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false evidence in the honorable court by saying that respondent’s parents gave Rs.40, 00,000/- worth agriculture land property items, large amounts of gold (present approximate price Rs.10, 00,000/-) and cash (Rs.3,00,000/-)to the petitioner which contradicts with her own written complaint in which it is said that those property items were given to respondent by her parents. Petitioner submits that the said property items were never existed on petitioner’s name with petitioner’s knowledge. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent’s false evidence could cause the petitioner U/s 3 of DP Act, hence petitioner request honorable court for appropriate action in the interest of justice.
VI. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false evidence saying respondent lived with petitioner at Bangalore from the day one of the marriage, i.e. from 11.11.2007. After marriage also respondent continued working at St.Theresa hospital, Yerragadda, Hyderabad till April-20th 2008, while petitioner is continued job at Bangalore, Karnataka. Respondent making such false statements to suit her false criminal story on the petitioner and on petitioner’s relatives to get convicted in criminal case registered by the respondent and also to get wrongful gain from Honorable court.
VII. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent admitted in her complaint to Kukatpally police that petitioner’s parents not lived with respondent’s family at Bangalore by stating that petitioner’s parents made phone calls to petitioner to giving advices to cause harassment to the respondent, which is false statement. Whereas in respondent’s CrPC-125 petition, respondent gave false evidence to the honorable court by saying respondent’s parents ill-treated the petitioner at Bangalore since day one of the marriage. Petitioner humbly submits that petitioner relatives did not live with respondent family to cause harassment at Bangalore.
VIII. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false evidence to the honorable court by saying that respondent was not provided phone facility during her stay at Bangalore with petitioner though respondent used the cell connection xxxxxxxxxxxxx and other phones provided by petitioner and respondent called her relatives and friends on that connection.
IX. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false evidence to the honorable court by saying that the petitioner harassed the respondent by not providing provide food and money to the petitioner during her stay at Bangalore, though respondent did shopping with petitioner, with neighbors and with friends at Bangalore to purchase required items for family life during her stay with petitioner at Bangalore. Respondent invited friends to the parties at home and had parties with them at Bangalore. Respondent attended marriage parties, birthday parties and picnics during her stay with petitioner.
X. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false evidence to the honorable court by saying that petitioner left the respondent alone at home, with out any intimation used to come to home after 3 days, 4 days and at times after one week also and during this period petitioner never gave any money even for food.
XI. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false information to the police by saying respondent brother purchased house hold items at Bangalore for the respondent family and petitioner harassed the respondent saying the house hold items are less. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent never caused injuries by the petitioner.
XII. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false information to the police by saying petitioner forced respondent to consume pregnancy abortion tablets to abort respondent pregnancy on 20th May-2008 and caused pregnancy abortion at Bangalore.
XIII. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false information to the police by saying petitioner publicized that respondent is carrying three months pregnancy while she was carrying 4 weeks pregnancy.
XIV. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false information to the police by saying petitioner thrown respondent out off house at Bangalore and took all her ornaments. Respondent left the matrimonial house despite petitioners requested respondent to stay back at matrimonial home at Bangalore.
XV. Petitioner humbly submits that respondent gave false evidence to the honorable court which could cause conviction in criminal case and destroys the normal living life of the petitioner. Respondent is approaching honorable court with false information and evidences causing the petitioner physical and mental harassment, loss of money, time, energy and causing defamation.
The above material is prepared by lawyer, please help me on whether I need to search for better lawyer to improvise this petition content.