Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raj Kumar Makkad (Adv P & H High Court Chandigarh)     04 February 2012

Sc judgement on 2g vindicates pac draft report, says joshi

BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi  today said that the Supreme Court verdict quashing 2G spectrum allocation to 122 companies is a virtual endorsement of the “draft report” of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) headed by him and vindicates his stand.

Welcoming yesterday’s Supreme Court decision, the PAC chairperson insisted that the apex court’s observations have
exposed what was earlier brought out in the proceedings of the Parliamentary panel.

He referred to the controversial “draft report” of the PAC which was leaked to the media and published by several newspapers and claimed there were several similarities between its content and the observations of the Supreme Court.

PTI

“The draft report states that spectrum and the license to use it should be separate. It also said the Finance Minister had suggested to Prime Minister that what has been done in 2G spectrum allocation has been done and there was no need for auction. The report also states that the additional spectrum given away free to these companies should be charged,” Joshi told reporters.

Asked if this meant the draft report of PAC on 2G spectrum was authentic, Joshi evaded a direct reply.

Drawing further similarities between the Supreme Court observations and the PAC draft report, Joshi said both said the price of 2G spectrum should have been determined through auction. The report had also called for cancellation of the licenses, which has been done by the court yesterday.

He maintained that when the Supreme Court observed that there had been a huge loss to the exchequer, it was in a manner endorsing the presumptive loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore arrived at by the CAG and endorsed in the draft report.

PTI



Learning

 1 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     04 February 2012

From the judgement of the Supreme Court,  we can culed out, not only the seperation of spectrum and license; but the big question is why the Minister of C&IT did not informed the four non-permanent members about the meeting, and why decisions was taken without the involving the Ministry of Fianance and the Minister of Law and Justice as per the TRAI's recomendations? Why the Minsitry of C&IT fixed cut off date as 25-09-2007 on 02-11-2007 and made known to the public on 10-01-2008 with the principle of first come first? The manner of grant of LOIs all indicates that the whole 2G spectrum was a stage managed in favor of certain vested interest against the Public Trust Doctrine.We hope that the CBI will come out with the whole truth in National Interest without any biased.

1 Like

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register