Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

sunil (cs)     10 June 2008

sale of mortgaged property

Dear Sir,


Please advise on the following,


A, House owner morgaged their property to the bank for certaing sum and executed the morgaged deed. The Bank did not registered the morgaged deed and granted the loan. A again sold the same property by duplicate sale deed to B.Now bank has lodged their claim on the same property on the basis of morgaged deed.


Now my query is


1. Whether bank has the right on the property on the basis of unregistered morgage deed.


2. Whehter B can lay their valid claimon the property.


3. Please cite any decided case law on the same fact for our guidance.


Regards


Sunil



Learning

 12 Replies

Manish Singh (Advocate)     10 June 2008

bank has the first right over your mortgaged property and that unregistered deed will work as a proper and binding evidence.


 

sunil (cs)     10 June 2008

Dear Manish Ji,


Thank you


I agreed with your ansfer, can you refer any supported case law to light on the decision.


it would very much helpful for me.


thank you again


Sunil

satish kumar dhaiya (manager( Law))     10 June 2008

please clarify which type of claim is lodge by the bank.


Being unregistered deed bank claim is not valid and B acquire a good title over the property.

sunil (cs)     10 June 2008

Dear Sir,


Bank is interested to excercise their lien in order to satisfy their loan by sale of morgaged property.


thanks


Sunil


 

Manish Singh (Advocate)     10 June 2008

Mr. Dhaiya, please be considered about opinion. an unregistered sale deed des not mean that you have lost your ownership since some other deed has been registered farudulently. several other factors are also consisdred while establishing good title over a property and unregistered sale , lease deed are admissible in the court of law as an evidence.

this is a mortgage done by depositing title to the mortgagee and bank has evry first right to get its debt cleared.


it would be better for you to satisfy the bnk's claim from the proceeds of the sale if you do not want to get into legal hassles.

Prakash Yedhula (Lawyer)     10 June 2008

The mortgage you must be one of deposit of title deeds. The mortgage deed need not be registered for this sort of mortgage. However, some of teh states have made it mandatory to register the memorandum of deposit of title deeds in order to indicate that there is an encumbrace over the subject property.

GOPI KRISHNA (ADVOCATE)     10 June 2008

the Bank has first charge over the property in question, for non payment of said sum Bank can proceed to recover the dues in respect of the property


for citations refer Banking law journals 

ESTHERPRIYA (Practising Advocate)     10 June 2008

Look Bank has claim on the property as the mortgage deed is executed
by A in favour of the Bank but the authenticity of the document and the
relevancy of the document can be disputed in the court of law because
unregistered document will have a less evidentiary value as per the
latest supreme court judgments.


However B who purchased the
property by way of scruitnizing the E.C. (encumbrance certificate) will
not be able to know about the existence of mortgage as it is an
unregistered document. Thus he is a bonafide purchaser and he has a
valid claim against the bank.


 


The possible solution is to repay the bank with less interest or to dispute the claim by way of mediation and negotiation.


 

sunil (cs)     11 June 2008

Dear Padmapriya Sir,


Can you refer that suprime court decision cited that  unregistered document will have a less evidentiary value.


it would be great help for me.


thanks


Sunil

a.manoharan (Advocate 94431 45884 advocatemanoharan@gmail.com)     15 June 2008


Dear Padmaprira,
I also need the SC Judgement as I differ from you.

Guest (n/a)     15 June 2008

 


1)      Lacchman Dass Vs. Ram Lal-(1989) 3 SCC 99: AIR 1989 SC 1923


         2) Hamada Ammal V. Avadiappa Pathar ( 1991) 1 SCC 715

ESTHERPRIYA (Practising Advocate)     15 June 2008

 


1)      Lacchman Dass Vs. Ram Lal-(1989) 3 SCC 99: AIR 1989 SC 1923


       2) Hamada Ammal V. Avadiappa Pathar ( 1991) 1 SCC 715


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register