May fir u/s 409/420 treat as notice in chq bounce case


Res experts,

an unauthorised money lender lodged FIR after chq bounce with adding few artificial facts u/s 409/420 where he clearly requested on complaint to police that please help to recover my amount. and accused got anticipatory bail.

after 4 months ( by manipulating in bank memo date with consent and help of bankers, he found return chq intimation after 102 days as he produced evidence while chq is CTS-2010 chq which does not transit to clearing house only images sent ) of  FIR he also sent notice u/s 138 which was not delivered but acceptable as per law"delivered". case registered in court and summoned but he did not disclose anywhere in any documents about FIR ?

my question is - will this FIR  treated as FIRST NOTICE and may request for quash ?

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

Search Forum:








×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu

web analytics