kindly advice,
is there any scope for challenging or going in appeal if such interim order is passed under sec 17 of arbitration & conciliation act 1996 by the arbitration tribunal ??
procedure to restrict the claimant bank from possessing custody of movable assests in case order has been passed under sec 17 of arbitration & conciliation act 1996 ??
i am in view that arbitrator has been biased and order has been passed in favour of claimant bank although i have been paying my emi regularly or maintaining bal for clearance of ecs but the claimant bank never deposited ecs due to technical reasons ??
appreciate reply....
