Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ashish (Director)     10 January 2014

Forgery without knowledge

Distinguished Members of Lawyersclubofindia.com

 

My query is regarding forgery and fraud without the knowledge of the presenter of the forged document

 

a)If an individual is accused of presenting a  Forged document but the accused is earnestly & actually unaware at the time of presentation of the document that it is a forged document then in such a case how can he prove his innocence. In other words what should be his legal recourse.

For eg :If one was to present a document to a government authority without any knowledge that the document is forged and with no personal gain or benefit then will the law prosecute the given person for presenting a forged document even though at the time of presentation the person was completely unaware of the given document being forged and where there was no personal gain what so ever.

 

b) In absence of the original document which is supposedly forged can it be concluded under law based on xerox copies of the said document that the given document is a forgery. If so has there be any such cases.

 

c)Can the honorable court pass a judgement based on xerox copies of a supposedly forged document.If so has there be any such cases.

d)In addition if the original forged document has been destroyed or unrecoverable what is the recourse under law to the plaintiff and the defendant.

e)Would the individual who claims that he was unaware in the first place of the document being a forgery or having any possible gain by executing the supposedly forged document be deemed as the one having the original document or willfully destroyed the same.

f)Finally in absence of a clear motive or personal gain to the person presenting a forged document and in absence of the original forged document does such a case hold worthy of trial and to what extent.Can it be quashed in initial stages of the trial.Also how can the person who was unaware of the forged document be acquitted of the alleged charge so that the real culprits be brought to stand trail.

g)Does the law differentiate between an attempt to forgery which was successfully detected and prevented with a an actual act of forgery executed for self gain.

 

Please respond 

 

Cheers :

 

Ashish



Learning

 1 Replies

Adv. Chandrasekhar (Advocate)     10 January 2014

a.S. 463 defines "foregery" and demands "criminal intention" and in the absence of intention it is not forgery.

b.  Original document has to be produced before the court.  If not available, the reasons for non-availability has to be explained to the criminal court, beyond reasonable doubt.

c. Not probable.

e.  The courts will not infer normally in such a way, and criminal courts demand every fact beyond reasonable doubt.

f.  It is rare in India in initial stages, the court acquit the persons.  Any how such person can challenge at the time of framing charges and also invoke S.482 cr.P.C. for quashing at H.C.  The results cannot be precisely predicted.

g. Yes. 

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register