Thanks Mr Bhartesh,
I have gone through this judgement and also the judgement refered as follows-
Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & Ors. v. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & Anr., (2011) 9 SCC 541, wherein this Court clearly concluded, that neither the District Forum nor the State Commission had power to review its “ex parte” orders.
As per me, the judgement means that district and state forum does not have power to set aside ex parte order passed by itself.
So, there are two cases at state commission level:
1. To set aside ex parte order passed by state commission.
2. To set aside ex parte order of district commission.
For Case 1, the judgement will be useful, but not in second case, is what I gathered from the judgement.
Because the ACT, has expressly given powers to state commission to review decisions of district commission.
Please let me know if my interpretation is wrong.