Learn about
Remember | Register | Forgot Password?
Bookmark This Page   RSS Feeds  Follow On Twitter

 

         
    



Please Wait ..


Discussion > Criminal Law > Procedure > Cr.pc 340 compliant   Unanswered Threads Post New Topic

Pages : 1


There are 3 Replies to this message


Anz A.


Associate
[ Scorecard : 86]
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted On 16 March 2012 at 23:40 Report Abuse

A house was illegaly grabbed by a tresspaser Mr. A in the absence of the true owner. When the owner returned he filed an FIR againts Mr. A and also had the electricity disconnected. After few weeks Mr. A (the tresspaser) while illegally occupying the house made his friend Mr. B pose as a tenant and filed a case in the House Controller Office (Sub-Divisional Magistrate) saying that the owner has discconnected the electricity connection to harrass Mr. B. Then Mr. A received notice on behalf of the owner by saying that he is the caretaker of the owner and supporting Mr. B claim in a rejoinder. On this the Sub-Divisional Magistrate passed an order directing the electricity connection to be retored.


Now the true owner came to know this fraud. What legal remedy he has to punish Mr. A and Mr. B for the fraud they have played. Is a complaint under Cr.PC 340 for perjury be filed or 420 case for forgery. Please advise.

Thank you.



adv. rajeev ( rajoo )


practicing advocate
[ Scorecard : 32565]
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted On 17 March 2012 at 06:28

Let him first file a civil suit for possession.  It is better.


Adv. Bharat Chugh


Advocate/Legal Consultant (bharat.law06@gmail.com)
[ Scorecard : 10324]
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted On 17 March 2012 at 09:01

Dear Querist,

This is a case of cheating by personation specifically made punishable in 417 IPC. Though the offence has been committed before the SDM(Executive Magistrate) - still there is no bar of S.195 and a Section 419 IPC complaint can be made directly before area magistrate. 

Do file the suit for possession.


Anz A.


Associate
[ Scorecard : 86]
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted On 17 March 2012 at 12:31

Dear Mr Chugh,

Possession has been regained by the owner. Would IPC 420, 468, and 120B too apply in this circumstance of obtaining electricity connection by fraud ?

 





Previous Thread
Previous
Next Thread
Next


Post your reply for Cr.pc 340 compliant



Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to login


Not a member yet ?? Click here to signup

Message







    

  • This is a public forum. Avoid posting content which you do not wish to disclose in public.
  • Use thank button to convey your appreciation.
  • Maintain professionalism while posting and replying to topics.
  • Try to add value with your each post.





Subscribe to the latest topics :


Forum Home | Forum Portal | Control Center | Who is Where | Popular Threads | Today's Topic | Recent Posts | Today's Posts | Post New Topic | Thread With Files | Top Threads - Month | Unreplied Topics | Forum Stats