Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

pawan (director)     01 October 2012

Cheque bounce: notice delivery

IN 138 CASE LEGAL NOTICE SENT BY EMAIL (AS ON WEB SITE) AND NOT BOUNCED BACK ALSO SENT BY REGD A.D AND SPEED POST WHICH WERE RETURNED BACK ( BY MANIPULATION )

IS 138 CASE IS MADE OUT OR COURT WILL ASK FOR PROOF OF LEGAL NOTICE DELIVERY OF SPEEDPOST OR A.D  KINDLY PROVIDE SOME JUDGEMENT IF POSSIBLE



Learning

 11 Replies

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (practicing advocate)     01 October 2012

Proof of service of notice is must.

Rama chary Rachakonda (Secunderabad/Highcourt practice watsapp no.9989324294 )     01 October 2012

After case is file by complainant in court, all documents are cross checked by Judicial Magistrate First Class, so original documents such as original cheque (bounced), original memo, copy of notice, receipt of post office, receipt of U.P.C., acknowledgement receipt, are required at the time of cross checking. The period of limitation is also verified at this stage.

Sankaranarayanan (Advocate)     03 October 2012

yes i too agreed with the experts.

pawan (director)     03 October 2012

Sir My question is i have proof of despatch on correct address but due to manipulation it is not delivered and returned back with remarks no such compnay on this adreess

 

What should be done or it will be presumed as proper service

pawan (director)     03 October 2012

Sir My question is i have proof of despatch on correct address but due to manipulation it is not delivered and returned back with remarks no such compnay on this adreess

 

What should be done or it will be presumed as proper service

andz (clerk)     04 October 2012

-you have proof of dispatch and whatever it is returned ad or mails(printed form) you can use them and in your case if they say there's no co. n you are suing a co. then hope that's a company cheque . . go ahead and file it . .

DAULAT DILBAUG (Problems related to money marriage matters.-dostnaye@gmail.com)     04 October 2012

Without delevery of notice no case is possible. Please read the section 138 carefully it has two parts issue of notice and reciept of notice.

For any cheque bounce case there are many such eascape routes for the accused.

V R SHROFF (Sr. ADVOCATE Bombay High Court Mob: 9892432152)     06 October 2012

Pawan. 

General Clases Act.SEC 27, 

Once Notice is sent by Regd Post to Last correct known address. it is deemed served. So Notice is served. You must produce proof that notice was served on his correct address and intimation sent by Post,mbut he did not collect. 

 

Shri Ramachary, 

UPC  UNDER POSTING CERTIFICATE ::: ARE GONE  DAYS.THOUGH IT WAS BEST AND CHEAPEST, & IMMEDIATE PROOF OF POSTING AT CORRECT ADDRESS. 

LAXMINARAYAN - Sr Advocate. ( solve problems in criminal cases. lawproblems@gmail.com)     06 October 2012

Many advocates remain under this misconception till the end of the case by misinterpreting the provisions of the GENERLA CLAUSES ACT.

1) First you have to prove by reliable evidence that the address where you sent the notice was last known address.

2) It is only your word that notice so sent by you is not returned back, you have to prove it by evidence.

Just possible the notice is recieved back undelevered and you are hiding this fact.

THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN DISCUSSED IN DETAIL IN MANY JUDGMENTS OF HIGHCOURTS AND EVEN APEX COURT.

LAXMINARAYAN - Sr Advocate. ( solve problems in criminal cases. lawproblems@gmail.com)     06 October 2012

Some enterprising litigant can send a regd AD letter to some address at ANDAMAN NICOBAR and claim it is not returened and the service of notice must be presuded. NO NOT AT ALL.

Other important aspect of service of notice is special in NI 138 which most of the complainant and their advocates forget ro read, appreciate or believe.And most the defense advocates are not agressive to defent their client so this most importat aspect is over looked.

Cheque bounce case is crimnal case and it is not for recovery of money but for PUNISHMENT.

THERE ARE TWO PARTS IN SECTION 138 FOR NOTICE. SUB SECTION B ) SAYS SENDING OF NOTICE AND SECTION  C) SAYS RECIEPT OF NOTICE AND BOTH ARE NOT SAME. 

SENDING OF NOTICE CAN BE PRESUMED BUT ON SAME BASIS ITS RECIEPT CAN NOT BE PRESUMED.

Advocate Dinesh Rajpurohit ( Advocate)     06 October 2012

IT TIME LIMIT has been not laps then you find is right address send it back by Reg. AD,, with acknowldge card ,,,

bcz if address is not correct or that person or company is not there then you face another proble while serving Summons ,,,or Warrant,,, so it would be good ,,,two thing

1 if notice period laps then again produce chaque before confirn Bank and get it specific Remark,

2 trace his correct address and sent the notice by Speed post or Reg. AD....

after that wait for report if u get back with remark keep it with u ,,and produce all document after filing of case at the time of verification ,,,,,,,

Adv. Dinesh Rajpurohit

B.A.,LL.B,LL.M, DCL, DCFS.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register