(Guest)

Basic principles for grant of temporary injunction?

Basic principles for grant of temporary injunction

This Court in Wander Ltd. (supra), while dealing with appeals against orders granting or refusing a prayer for interlocutory injunction, did reiterate that the same, being in exercise of judicial discretion, the appellate court ought not interfere therewith and substitute its own discretion except where such discretion is shown to have been exercised arbitrarily or capriciously or perversely or where the Court whose order has been appealed from, had ignored the settled principles of law, regulating grant or refusal of interlocutory injunctions. It was enunciated, that appeal against exercise of discretion is an appeal on principle and the appellate court would not reassess the materials and seek to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the court below, if it was reasonably possible on the materials available. It was held as well, that the appellate Court in such a situation would normally not be justified in interfering with the exercise of discretion of the Court below, if made reasonably and in a judicial manner, solely on the ground that if it had considered the matter at the trial stage, it would have come to a contrary conclusion. It was proclaimed that an interlocutory remedy is intended to preserve in status quo, the rights of the parties which may appear on a prima facie examination of a case. It was held that the prayer for grant of interlocutory injunction, being at a stage when the existence of the legal right asserted by the plaintiff and its alleged violation are both contested and uncertain and remain uncertain till they are established at the trial on evidence, it is required to act on certain well-settled principles of administration of such interlocutory remedy which is both temporary and discretionary. Referring to the fundamental object of interlocutory injunction, this Court noted with approval that the need for such protection of the plaintiff against injury by violation of his rights must be weighed against the corresponding need of the defendant to be protected against any injury resulting from the restraint on the exercise of his rights, as sought for, which he could not be adequately compensated. The need of one, thus was required to be compared against the other, to determine the balance of convenience to ensure an appropriate exercise of discretion for an interim remedy as suited to a particular fact situation.

Bombay High Court

Sharma Realty Pvt. Ltd. And 2 ... vs Vinod Muktinath Sharma on 21 January, 2016

Bench: K.R. Sriram

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 




                                                                                         COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO.74 OF 2015




                                                                                 WITH

COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.114 OF 2015

                                                                           Citation:2016(2) ALLMR427

https://www.lawweb.in/2016/05/basic-principles-for-grant-of-temporary.html

Reply Follow

0 Replies

Related Threads

Start a New Discussion Unreplied Threads

Popular Discussion

Basic principles for grant of temporary injunction?