Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ramkumar Av (pvt employee)     23 January 2017

498a trail

A-1 to A-3 are present. A-1 to A-3 are examined under section 239 Cr.P.C. charge-sheet allegation is read-over and explained to them . After having understood the same the A-1 to A-3 are denied the same. Charge under Section 498-A of IPC framed against A1 and charge under section 498-A r/w 34 of IPC framed against A2 and A3. The said charge read over and explained to them  After having understood the same, the A1 to A3 pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to L.w.1 to 3. Who is ths L w 1 to 3.

Is there any chance to prove this case as False. please advice 



Learning

 5 Replies

Pawan S (Advocate)     23 January 2017

No valuable suggestion can be expressed until I know the facts in details.

Sachin (N.A)     23 January 2017

The order posted by you only means that court will hear the case u/s 498a/34 on merits.

 

Don't worry its very difficult to prove 498a

Ramkumar Av (pvt employee)     23 January 2017

Thank you sachin, but wat about L. W. 1to 3...is that my opponent

Ramkumar Av (pvt employee)     23 January 2017

And also I heard that, the statement given by in-laws and wife will be taken to consideration, not mine is it true, if so how can I prove my innocence....

Sachin (N.A)     23 January 2017

Responsibility to prove is on prosecution.

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register