Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Learning

 8 Replies

Dr J C Vashista (Advocate)     28 April 2019

What is your problem, if it is not an examination hall question paper? 

However, if there is some truth in your story consult a local prudent lawyer with relevant documents for better appreciation, guidance and proceeding.

G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.)     28 April 2019

Search in google and you can find the best articles and case studies.  In short, when females got rights in self-acquired property of their parents if they expired intestate, the 2005 act gives rights to female co-sharers also equal rights with that of male co-sharers if the property remains undivided, and if father and co-sharer are living by 2005 cut of date.

Shashi Dhara   28 April 2019

2005 judgement has splitted every family which cud not be patched.these judgements r all family breaking judgements which cud not be reparable .I have seen in advocates office every one come and try they have any share in her father's property or son in laws come and quarrel they have any share. in father in law's property. This had made lazy and no one is ready to work and earn livliehood.in one of my case son in law fought for father in law's property for34yrs in court i.e from1984to2018 in high court they compromised.by giving share even no act was in 1984.every day life is becoming horrible.

krishna rao (retired)     28 April 2019

Thank you sir for your reply in 2005 act towards married daughters claim in ancestors property, as you said daughters father died in 1980, which he was alive as on 2005 act, which was filed in case in 2013, now only their advocates agrees as per 2005 act they are eligible for ancestors property. now preliminary judgement is going to give after may 2019

thank you very much

 

krishna rao (retired)     28 April 2019

sir above as per act 2005 passsed in 9.9.2005 their father was not alive, but died in 1980, sorry for above , preliminary judgement is going to come as a married daughters claim , they are not eligible for ancestors property, because father died in 1980

thats was clarified our lawer thanks

krishna rao (retired)     28 April 2019

sir above as per act 2005 passsed in 9.9.2005 their father was not alive, but died in 1980, sorry for above , preliminary judgement is going to come as a married daughters claim , they are not eligible for ancestors property, because father died in 1980

thats was clarified our lawer thanks

krishna rao (retired)     28 April 2019

thank you for kind reply thanks

krishna rao (retired)     01 May 2019

THANKS

R KRISHNA RAO


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register