Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

notice for less tax paid

(Querist) 22 September 2016 This query is : Resolved 
I received a notice from income tax for paying Rs 4/- less income tax this financial year please suggest whether it is necessary to pay Rs 4/- and also guide me how can I pay it thanks
naveen mehta (Querist) 23 September 2016
Kindly suggest about my query
Guest (Expert) 23 September 2016
Academic query.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 23 September 2016
Strange you received such notice.

However, pay the same.
Guest (Expert) 23 September 2016
Are you not willing to pay the tax dues? If not any specific hitch?
Guest (Expert) 23 September 2016
Even it there is any reality of receiving a notice from IT Department, don't you feel, it is shameless question on your part, if you feel any hesitation to pay such a meagre amount of Rs.4, as tax due?
cherukuri prasad (Expert) 23 September 2016
That is computer generated. Just ignore and relax. Do not respond.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 23 September 2016
Expert cherukuri prasad sir,

Are you sure, the computer system would not start recovery procedure for this small amount? May be ignored if manual intervention done at later stage.

Practically, IT department is going to loose in this collection, Apart from normal follow up expenses it has to pay Rs. 20-25 to Banker for depositing / collecting the challan for Rs. 4/-.
Guest (Expert) 23 September 2016
Without description by the querist, the assumption on the part of Shri Cherukuri Prasad about the notice being computer generated or the reason to ignore is not understood.
R K JAIN (Expert) 24 September 2016
As per Section 288B of IT Act amount is five or more to be increased to the next higher amount which is a multiple of ten and if the last figure is less than five the amount shall be reduced to the next lower amount. Amount 4 payable is not understood and it can not be and same is to be brought to the notice of IT Department CPC so the computer programme can be corrected as per IT Act.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 24 September 2016
Expert : R K JAIN Sir,

since as per query, notice has been received, tax has to be paid, till software is amended or otherwise.

naveen mehta (Querist) 24 September 2016
Mr dhingra why will I hesitate to pay 4/- as I have already paid about 36000/- and it is the miscalculation from my CA that I have to pay Rs 4/- extra now but the amount is so low I didn't know how to pay it that's y I asked how to pay in my next part of my question if you would have had read my query completely u wouldn't have asked such rubbish thing to me publicly 😝
Guest (Expert) 24 September 2016
Dear Shri Jain,

It is merely an academic query of the querist, not a problem, as he has not given any detailed description of the problem, more particularly about whether he rounded of the total tax payable & paid, or rounded off under various different sub-heads of taxes like income tax, education cess, surcharge etc., which was essential elements of problem to be disussed for solution.

Contrarily, he simply stated about receipt of notice and wanted to knpw whether he should pay or not.

I hope you would like to appreciate that there was no room for the experts to presume that he would have rounded off the tax as per provisions of section 288B.

Had there been any real problem, he would definitely have discussed the background of the case.

Guest (Expert) 24 September 2016
Mr. Naveen Mehta,

I have not asked you any rubbish thing, rather your own question was quite rubbish.

Question arises, have you discussed anywhere in your original query that you had paid Rs. 36,000/- as tax or how you rounded off the tax amount or there was a calculation mistake on the part of your own CA, which you have stated, as a lame excuse?

Your simple question was about receipt of notice without discussing even the contents of the notice and under which section the notice was served to you.

The question arises, if you had already paid Rs.36,000/- where was the justification of your question to ask from the experts here, instead of your own CA, for necessity to pay Rs 4/-, when you knew that it was miscalculation from your CA?

Not only that was your own CA so incapable to tell you about how could you pay that amount, while you had adopted some specific method to pay Rs. 36,000/-, as tax?

If you think you have put your questions before idiots, who would not understand anything or the artificiality of the problem, you may better think of your own position, what you could be in that case. In fact, your own thinking is rubbish.


P. Venu Online (Expert) 24 September 2016
What is the opinion of your CA? anyhow, in such cases, the IT Department attaches the copy of the challan and this could be credited in any Nationalised Bank.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 24 September 2016
Deposit the same through challan (form 280 online) on the basis of notice giving demand reference.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 25 September 2016
Much is much. Pay it through challan and close the chapter.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 25 September 2016
If the intention of the author was to pay the demanded amount then his query would have to ask for the procedure and not the liability.

Hungama Khda karna bhi to koi kaam hai.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 26 September 2016
In the challan 280 sub head of deposit code 400 is to be mentioned.

Please do not forget to enter correct AY to which the demand relates.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 26 September 2016
You shall now rightly be benefited when even head of challan has been told to you.
naveen mehta (Querist) 27 September 2016
No mr dhingra don't get so animated my CA told me to pay 4/- through challan but during discussion with some other ca they told me to ignore it as the amount is less than 5/- so I posted it here just to clarify my self and thanks mr Rajendra k Goyal for the exact solution thanks all the experts .
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 27 September 2016
You are welcome.

Please do not forget to enter correct AY on challan to which the demand relates.
Guest (Expert) 27 September 2016
Mr. Naveen Mehta,

Did you mention anywhere what was told to you by your own CA and what some other CA? Even here also, one expert has advised you you not to respond, ignore and relax. You are free to act upon that advice also.

When you have utterly failed to discuss your problem appropriately, why do you feel annoyed, if some questions were asked or your query was treated as an academic query, which it reveals so?

Question arises, do you believe that you have put your question before a class of astrologers to predict what is what of your problem and what should be the solution for that? Even to an astrolger, you have to give proper background.

Also, have you anywhere stated, how your CA calculated the tax amount, whether by rounding of the individual elements of tax or the whole of the tax amount.

Mind it, there is no question of making any guess at legal parlance, if you hide the basic facts.
naveen mehta (Querist) 27 September 2016
Sure mr dhingra I will take care of your advice in future , and sorry if have hurt u in ignorance also thank you and everybody else for your concern and help with quick response . It's a great platform for resolving such typical queries
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 28 September 2016
You are welcome.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :