FORGERY

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 18 January 2018 This query is : Resolved
Coming to facts Sir,That the accused had changed the DOB in the photocopy of SSC memo for applying of passport,But not in the original memo,which was submitted to authority.He was charged with Forgery.My doubt is that Whether the alteration made in the secondary evidence i.e(Photocopy of memo) is a forgery.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Isaac Gabriel (Expert) 18 January 2018
The passport application would be rejected .The authority will not resort to any action.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 18 January 2018
Sir,He was charged with 368 and convicted for altering photocopy of memo.Can this be valid

Kappil Cchandna (Expert) 18 January 2018
Yes very much valid .....

Warm Regards
Kapil Chandna Advocate
9899011450

Adv. Yogen Kakade (Expert) 18 January 2018
Now as he has been charged under penal provisions.. only option for him to defend strongly before the trial court..
But I think you are mistaking with the section 368, in this case sec 368 IPC does not apply.
It is advisable to take help of a good lawyer.. All the best

Adv. Yogen Kakade
Jurycon Incorporation (Advocates & Consultants)
Email: juryconincorporation@gmail.com
Web: www.juryconn.in Phone: 020-65248888

N.K.Assumi (Expert) 18 January 2018
Any alteration of documents with the intention to deceived amounts to criminal offence, as simple as that.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 18 January 2018
what are full facts of the case and how are you connected.

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 19 January 2018
If you are really concerned for grant of an obligation of FREE legal advise from experts on this platform you will have to disclose your identity, however, "ANONYMOUS" author like you, are not entertained.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now