on section 376 and 420 of IPC

shoaib (Querist) 11 April 2010 This query is : Resolved
sir, whether supreme court of held that when the prosecutrix and accuse were major n they have consensus sex. girl on the promise of marrige had sexual intercourse. But later lodge a report of alleging rape. supreme court held that offense of rape is not made out and it is the duty of the prosecutrix that not to have sex merely on the promise of marrige as the sex before marriage is not condition precedent for marriage. Sir in the year 2008 to 2009 this judgment was reported can u help me in finding out that in which journal it was reported.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Arvind Singh Chauhan (Expert) 11 April 2010
Sir I don't have the knowledge of the case referred by you. when ever you find please send also to me. I am citing another case law as be low-

Sexual intercourse between adult male (21 years) and adult female (19 Years) of age –both deeply in love with each other- retracting from promise to marry by male- female getting pregnant and lodging F.I.R.- alleged that consent obtaining by fraud and false promise- held case is of sexual intercourse with free consent not a case of rape- Uday Versus State Of Karnataka- A.I.C.-2003-Vol-5-S.C.-576.

shoaib (Querist) 11 April 2010
arvind sir thanks for ur reply on my querry. that is true sir that offence of rape is not made out but what i need is whether offence of cheating is made out under this situation?