What all charges can be framed for this case
prakash vka
(Querist) 29 January 2015
This query is : Resolved
The father of complaint was admitted to aims on 15th June 2014 with a small wound .the complaint with the help of his relative and friends had taken vk.kumarkrishnan . and admitted him to hospital .He was admitted for a period of nearly 4 months during the period his son and relative used to stay as by stander .. The petitioner was not able to stay in the hospital contiguously. So he arranged a bystander from aritha by name maggi who was the bystander for a period of one month .during my absents . Ratna kumauri and her daughter started visiting my father at hospital this lady has stayed with my father for few years . because of this lady my mother became a chartrib person and at present her where about is not know.she started to withdraw money from fathers account When I noticed the withdrawal I filed an MHOP at district court palakkad to safe guard my fathers money . I had gone out of state for some bussines propuse This lady discharge d my father without informing anyone from my home town .some relatives of my father planned to see my father at the hospital . the went to railway station took ticket from ottapalam to edapaly station just before boarding the train Ratna kumar called them and told not to bourd the train because they ll not be allowed to see my father.My father dead on 25th oct and the hearing for MHOP was due on 27 oct 2014
1. My father was not to be discharge from hospit due to reason his saturation level was varying time to time
2. In case of discharge being the moral duty it was must to inform the petitioner being the only son also the relative of kumarkrishnan
3. Dead of the descend just two days before the hearing of the medical op.
4. 10 oct the descend was discharged 12 th kumarkrishnan relative had gone to see kumarkrishnan which was not allowed
5. Ratna kumari had withdrawn 7 lac from different bank without anyreason with in one month
6. Withdrawn using withdrawly sip from state bank of india pension account which is illegally and personally as my wife of kumarakrishnan
7. If the MHOP was heard Ratna kumara and her doughter would lose all right over the fixed deposits’
8. The discharge of kumara Krishnan by Nb raghunath and beena kumara lends suecpect that the dead was unnatural
9. Ratna kumara had withdrawn Rs 1600000/- which belong to my mother on 29 th march 2014 from cherplery co- orative bank operating to be ratna kumara thankam who is the actual wife of kumarekrishnan
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 29 January 2015
Too long a story, it is not a query to be opined.
Consult and engage a local lawyer.
P. Venu 
(Expert) 29 January 2015
What is your query? The facts are incomplete and confusing.
What is your aims, aritha and MHOP?
ajay sethi
(Expert) 29 January 2015
consult a local lawyer
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 01 February 2015
It is okay that you have narrated the story, but what about the actions taken by you in this regard. It is a cheating case and also involves impersonation. What have you been doing for months when that lady and her daughter used to visit the hospital for days/months. Did you not suspect them even once? If you have filed MHOP, then why did you allow them to be present with the patient despite knowing that they have swindled off the mentally ill patients money by forging his signature?, You have many questions to be answered based n your own contention. You may proceed with the advise of your present lawyer itself if he is found to be reliable or take the help of some other good lawyer and decide next course of action as per his further advise.
