Question about hc suppress evidence produce and delivered judgment.

sushil (Querist) 29 November 2015 This query is : Resolved
In WP No.7790 of 2009 Bombay HC. Ld.Single Judge delivered judgment after 9 months of its pronouncement. I am the concerned workman & member of MBPT union. My Company file above writ petition against award in CGIT Complaint No.2 of 2 of 2007. Company objected that, union has no authority to file such complaint u/s.33A of I.D.Act,1947. Union submitted CGIT Exh.45 in which workmen authorised union to represent in the proceeding of complaint u/s.33A & drew attention of Sec.36 of I.D. Act alonwith the citation of Karnataka HC in ‘B.D.K. Process Controls Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh-2002’ . While delivering judgment Ld.Single Judge recorded that:‘12] In the case on hand, the respondent does not rely upon any provision that permits filing of such complaint by a person other than the aggrieved employee. Nor does it claim that any specific authority was given to it by the six employees to file the complaint. In the circumstances, the complaint filed by the union must be held to be not maintainable and liable to be dismissed on that ground alone.'That means Ld. Single Judge recorded false Statement in judgment/order. What is the solution to correct this things.Is there provision to make application in Bombay HC aginst this wrong thing. Bombay HC completely close the way to file LPA. Please guide me.

Follow Query

Report Abuse