Posted On 13 June 2012 at 20:14
Subject : Implimentation of Reform act
Sir, Referring to Gridco Service Transfer Scheme 1996, 19th Board of Director meeting dated 29/07/1997, Orissa Electricity Reform Act of 1998, 8th HRD Committee held on 06/01/99,53rd Board of Directors meeting held on dated 18/09/2000, the 64th Board of Directors meeting held on 02/06/2002, the applications against anomalies on fitment to higher pay as sought to be considered by the authority against implementation of seniority list of General Telecom Cadre was disposed without giving due weightage over their seniority. The fact that the reform act was aiming to ameliorate the stagnation of promotion in different the cadre ,particularly with Talcher Thermal Cadre,because they have already faced a reform.(there was no structre of promotion or further fitment for those to be agrieved ) We 17 Engineers ,under Telecom General Cadre were deprived of getting the benifit against 3 juniors ( because they were just compliting the one time mileage of 8 years as on 31/03/97,but are not under Orissa Public Service Commission service,hence not under seniority but adhoc appointed and regularised by cabinet approval ) because the 64th Board of directors meeting rejected our representation under saying of "a wrong decision taken earlier cannot be a precedent and if required the legalitiy of the earlier decision of the fitment principles can be reviewed and appropriate decision could be taken to set right any act which is wrong and not correct". Can you move to the court to correct the implimentation of above wrong act and hence get the benifit of fitment with effect from date of complition of 8 years service(falling short of few months to two years as on 31/03/97 to 8 years) Please advice Thanks Binayak Acharya,Assistant Engineer since joining of 21/10/1989.
Sent to : Admin on 11 June 2012