Recent Comments


Displaying 8960 - 8970 of 10029 in 1003 pages

Directions issued by SC under Article 142 of the Constitution do not constitute a binding precedent

View All

Narendra Sharma Wrote on 10 July 2011

Kindly note carefully above in State of U.P. Vs Neeraj Awasthi:- "Such directions having evidently been issued by this Court in EXERCISE OF ITS POWER UNDER ARTICLE 142 of the Constitution of India DO NOT CONSTITUTE A BINDING PRECEDENT"



Wrong Identification by Advocate and It's Consequences

View All

KHURSHED AHMED Wrote on 10 July 2011

Helpful and guidative



Older and Modern Methods of Trial

View All

Sarica Ashok Reddy Wrote on 09 July 2011

thanks sandeep and harshit:)



Useful SC judgment -"Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev vs State of Maharashtra" decided on 07.02.11

View All

PJANARDHANA REDDY Wrote on 09 July 2011

PLEASE GO TO THE LINK FOR FULL JUDGMENT http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/15322/



Wrong Identification by Advocate and It's Consequences

View All

RohitChhaba Wrote on 09 July 2011

i think correct citation is 1973 CRI. L. J. 47



Anna Hazare & Article 80 (3) Constitution of India

View All

A. Patrawala Advocate Wrote on 09 July 2011

Petition is transferred on 07 Jul 2011 to Ministry of Home Affairs Officer. You are requested to further liaise in the matter directly with Joint Secretary Coord. & P, Ministry of Home Affairs, Room No. 9,North Block, New Delhi for further information.



Defeated Labour Laws in India

View All

sambasivakamasani Wrote on 09 July 2011

True picture is shown. I have a request. There is one contractor having multiple contracts under one principal employer, but non of the single contract is more than 20 workers. Is it necessary that the contractor should obtain the lisence? Regards



Wrong Identification by Advocate and It's Consequences

View All

Ravikant Soni Wrote on 08 July 2011

Thanx arif, thanks niraj.



Wrong Identification by Advocate and It's Consequences

View All

niraj Wrote on 08 July 2011

thanks for submitting this appreciable judgment,but all practicing advocates should be aware of these type of fraudulent persons.



Directions issued by SC under Article 142 of the Constitution do not constitute a binding precedent

View All

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g Wrote on 08 July 2011

this is for this citation only and not for all.


Click here to report abuse or copyright issues





×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu