dear sir, as i understand and have observed in courts cases, in such kind of suit for declaration generally State is made as opposite party.. judge is also right because as per CPC their should be atleast one opposite party to a suit, against whom the relief is sought for..
in the cases of jus in rem the State is made as necessary party for being the State representing all its subjects and in case of any further dispute arising adversely to decision of the suit in rem, State agency would come to the help of the plaintiff..
please correct me if you find something diffrent..
Mere non-compliance with certain laws shall not be a ground for action u/s 397 unless the person making the application proves to the satisfaction of CLB that the same amounts to real oppression and its continuance would cause real prejudice to the minority shareholders. The word "Oppression" means wrongful, Harsh or burdensome. A single instance or solitary transaction though illegal or irregular cannot per se be a ground.But much depends upon the factual matrix of each case. There are decisions wherein it was held that even a single transaction can constitute oppression(see software mart India ltd 1999 34 CLA 212(CLB) etc.
Anyway thanks to you for the nice article.
sivadas chettur email@example.com
wats the use of rules for policemen. they wil say they did investigation and show that they found everything to prove arrest. wat wil any1 do then?
aisay ladki walay itnay bastard hotay hai aur police to haraam ka khana chorti nahi.judge sirf attendence lagatay hai , note kamatay hai. judgement aisi paas kartay hai ki jiska tod system kay paas already hota hai.
Hindu marital laws are disgrace.