Recent Comments


Displaying 20 - 30 of 9170 in 917 pages

Examination of the Accused u/s 313 of CRPC

View All

Saritax Wrote on 07 January 2018

What if a 313 statement is offered to ONLY SOME accused and not all the accused? Could it be used as a tool to let off some accused who implicate others?



The 2G judgment of trial court: The travesty of truth and justice

View All

Ravindranathan Wrote on 06 January 2018

a layman's doubt: if Article 141 binds the trial court to pronounce the accused guilty, why go through the farce of atrial?



MPs And MLAs Should Be Stopped From Practising

View All

dr g balakrishnan Wrote on 06 January 2018

law maker is the very law breaker - CJI need not give a hearing for law breaker law makers that is very writ law.



In A First Junior Advocates To Get Rs 3000 Per Month Stipend

View All

A.A.JOSE BARODA Wrote on 06 January 2018

Without going into the justifications for fixing up such paltry amount, one would really welcome this decision to start atleast payment of some amount which hopefully will be increased in due course of time.



In A First Junior Advocates To Get Rs 3000 Per Month Stipend

View All

Siddharth Kakka Wrote on 06 January 2018

normally advocates gets 15000₹ as a starting pay in chamber practise , if they had done anywhere internship , if not then too any firm pays atleast 5000₹ , ntg big is declaring 3000₹ as stipend , in today's ,inflation if being proffesional getting just 3000₹ is an scope then they could have earned it by doing any clerical work



Some flaws of the Triple Talaq Bill passed by Lok Sabha

View All

r vasudevan capt Wrote on 05 January 2018

i fully agree with shri kumar ,this bill is not banning talaq but criminalizing triple talaq in one go and that is exactly what is needed



Gearing up for filing income tax returns

View All

Amrit arora Wrote on 04 January 2018

nice artical



Conversion For Marriage Must Be Curbed: Uttarakhand HC

View All

A.A.JOSE BARODA Wrote on 04 January 2018

It is solely for the State Legislature to decide as to what law is to be enacted and the High Court ought to have restrained itself from making such suggestions. However, religious conversion solely for the purpose of marriage needs to be strictly curbed.



Important Judgments on Presumption of Service by Registered Post

View All

V. VASUDEVAN Wrote on 03 January 2018

Good One. I have successfully used this case law in my litigations and succeeded. People don't appreciate this strong means of service and rely on couriers who have vague systems of out sourcing andsub-outsourcings



Some flaws of the Triple Talaq Bill passed by Lok Sabha

View All

sanjay kumar Wrote on 03 January 2018

I think the debate on the matter is a non-issue. It has been made in the public as if the legislation has banned the practice of Triple Talaq, which is not the case. The Sharia Law has well described procedure for Divorce. Contrary to Hindu or Christian Belief System that marriages are made in Heavens, the marriage is a social contract in Sharia Law. Therefore, just as the contract can be made it can be broken too. The Sharia Law provides enough space for reconciliation and reapproachment. However, the society has circumvented the Law to suit the need of the Men and in the process women have suffered. Just pronouncement of Talaq three times is worng as per Sharia as well as on moral grounds. Regarding majority-minority issue, the majority has the moral obligation to look after the interests of the minorities and just and right things for the minorities should not be looked down upon as forcing of majority will on the minorities. Regarding making Triple Talaq a non-cognisable offence, one needs to go into deeper. The intent is not only to make Instant Talaq null and avoid but also to deter the husband in avoiding taking the recourse of Triple Talaq. Suppose, a husband pronounces Triple Talaq and what is the meaning of making it null and void if there is no legal repurcussions to the husband. In order to deter a husband making an act which has been declared null and void by the Law, some kind of deterrent if required. Regarding misuse of the provisions by wifes against their husbands, in that case, the onus of the proof of husband having pronounced Triple Talaq, shall lie with the wife and not the husband.


Click here to report abuse or copyright issues





×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu

web analytics