i think one need be cautious in behaving when he holds a great office of court of record - if Karnan is to get reprieve the hon court may in place of six months jail can fine him for his contempt if he appears before judges and say why he behaved the way he behaved without providing any meaningful evidence of documents to fix corruption on judges as SCI is never support any corruption? besides why his behavior cannot be a corrupt activity by a judge of a high court, though he was suspended for his first contempt and his second contempt when he chose to issued an untenable order of NBW against seven judges besides asking them to appear before him a suspended judge from judicial duties and administrative function and some untenable orders based upon some anger - if a judge is angry could he function s judge at all if so under what Articles of the constitution? if he rightly answers he may be given some relief else he might be charged under Prevention of corruption Act as he misused the precincts of the high court of calcutta...
so now that hon SCI has admitted the appeal - i would say would we shd not fine him some exemplary punishment like exemplary damages hon court fines on Karnan?
see what Karnan did 'Karnan now at least realizes SCI only can help him ; but yet behaves funny he seems to move to see hon President and seek parliament to impeach him are still senseless moves ; he is still over recalcitrant - he failed to understand what Kural says' Karka kasadara Karka, katrapin nirka thaga' '( learn without errors , once learning stand by it) it seems he never understands very Kural when so how can you admire him as a suitable judge of a court a court of record he needs to realize - in fact Art 17 never really allows the Atrocities Act 1989, if read with art 368 - if one reads CJI Mr S R Das full bench (1951) held in a st of madras case in regard to reservation of med education and engineering seats in the C. Duraiswamy v st of madras - though she was not an applicant but srinivasan was, the court held, state cannot enforce seat reservation in the face of rt 14 r/w Art 368 (this Art 368 simply bars any parliament cannot invade part III fundamental rights) enshrined in the constitution of India , and after introduction of 'secular' in the constitution, there cannot be any religion of any caste has any recognition as such - the word 'Dalits' in the Atrocities Act is unsustainable ; but if it is applicable to every citizen then 'equality' comes into action, so there is no 'reservation principle at all sustainable, one needs to appreciate more so by the very Apex court, if it is done it can under Art 142 can cause judicial review and carry on necessary 'severability ' of the relevant sections under doctrine of severability then this act can be sustainable under social justice is my considered opinion , as ministry of social justice s applicable to every citizen of the country not under so called 'reservation' for 'reservation' down grades either education or downgrades skill level in jobs - so reservation idea is just archaic think is another considered opinion - see US has down graded our NRIs to be under H 1 B visa, as the feeling indian education is not fully recognized as 'suitable' to be absorbed directly in job areas unless the Indian NRI secures US MS degree after their their Indian qualification - see in medical field Indian medical men without recognized US MS degree they cannot be registered in US medical council to enable him/her to practice there - we may know - , so every where else - we depend on foreign jobs as India is not able to produce domestic jobs, but we need to depend on out sourcing countries to provide sensible jobs to our own properly educated class of people only(youth) - so we can realize how badly our so called ' reservations affected our youths future see many of our educational institutions are yet to be in the top ten , not in india but in the world; till then we will ensure second class status - that is west wanted to ensure on Indians unless political class is sensible as law makers Ind cannot itself reach higher like Chinese. S.Koreans... i say with remorse
confirmed contemnor need to be punished - contempt cannot be evaluated as lac or 10 lacs - in fact condemnation like karnan obviously might have costed SCI and judicial system quite over several crores besides affected public credibility on judge like karnan.
You need to be
logged in to post comment
You can also submit your article by sending to email@example.com
view more »
Our Network Sites
Join LAWyersclubindia.com and Share your Knowledge. Registered members get a chance to interact at Forum, Ask Query, Comment etc.