In the USA kind democracies, India too adopted American doctrines while constitution of India making, so also of Irish Constitution and the UK and others too, obviously we ought to be more and more humane in our approach to life and living. Children need to be conscious of the fact, once they become adult they ought to take care of aged parents who become differently 'disabled' i.e., their earning levels become just plateau or practically Zero; if they do not come and live with their children but stay out of them that itself something great the children need to realize; after living together is just for food and some reasonable shelter and clothing; if the parents stay out then the children shd feel very happy;in fact children can financially help the parents if the parents live away, that is the civilization of humanity .
Here in the case citation, son could not prove his co-ownership, very straight information emanated, so the court is obviously right.
Always, son's upbringing is the parents duty, from infanthood to teenage ; there after the son/daughter ought to take care of their parents, when they fail sec 125 of Cr PC arises; so the it is the duty under Art 51A of the Constitution of India , that makes it mandatory when r/w Art 14 in a normal issues; as the sec 125 of Cr P C gains mandatory status when r/w Art. 51A, as we gave unto ourselves this constitution which is a basic primary contract of living in India.
You need to be
logged in to post comment
You can also submit your article by sending to email@example.com
view more »
Our Network Sites
Join LAWyersclubindia.com and Share your Knowledge. Registered members get a chance to interact at Forum, Ask Query, Comment etc.